Reading pathogen epigenomes; a new stem cell; dealing with research misconduct; monkey fossils; exploratory mice grow new neurons; watching metamorphosis
The Scientist
Most Recent
The NIH has required researchers to receive instruction about responsible conduct for more than 20 years, but misconduct is still on the rise.
Should institutions invest in changing the behavior of scientists found guilty of violating research rules and ethics?
Fifty-three studies authored by shamed Tilburg University social psychologist Diederik Stapel have now been pulled from the literature.
A former University of Washington researcher did commit misconduct 10 years ago, according to the Office of Research Integrity.
A biomedical researcher whose Nature paper was called into question was found dead in his lab.
Using plagiarism detection software, the NSF’s internal watchdog has found almost 100 suspicious cases among the 8,000 projects the agency funded in 2011.
A mysterious case of proteomics plagiarism leads to an odd timeline for a retraction.
A Case Western Reserve University researcher is found guilty of altering the number of samples and results to inflate the statistical significance of his findings.
The authors of a review article on genome-wide association studies have retracted the paper due to “substantial textual overlap” with other sources.
Follow The Scientist
Stay Connected with The Scientist
-
The Scientist Magazine
-
The Scientist Careers
-
Neuroscience Research Techniques
-
Genetic Research Techniques
-
Cell Culture Techniques
-
Microbiology and Immunology
-
Cancer Research and Technology
Current Issue
