ADVERTISEMENT

404

Not Found

Is this what you were looking for?

tag nuclear chemistry microbiology neuroscience

Those We Lost in 2019
Ashley Yeager | Dec 30, 2019 | 6 min read
The scientific community said goodbye to Sydney Brenner, Paul Greengard, Patricia Bath, and a number of other leading researchers this year.
Contributors
Diana Kwon | May 1, 2017 | 4 min read
Meet some of the people featured in the May 2017 issue of The Scientist.
Collage of those featured in the article
Remembering Those We Lost in 2021
Lisa Winter | Dec 23, 2021 | 5 min read
As the year draws to a close, we look back on researchers we bid farewell to, and the contributions they made to their respective fields.
The Ears Have It
Anna Azvolinsky | Sep 1, 2015 | 8 min read
A teaching obligation in graduate school introduced James Hudspeth to a career focused on how vertebrates sense sounds.
Bioterrorism Research: New Money, New Anxieties
John Dudley Miller | Apr 6, 2003 | 8 min read
Ned Shaw US scientists have reason to feel both heady and scared. The federal government recently released unprecedented billions of dollars to fund bioterrorism research. Yet, the merits of this sudden shift in focus are being debated, and some worry that the money will be squandered or wasted. "I have been really very upset by the focus on bioterrorism," says Stanley Falkow, professor of microbiology and immunology and of medicine at Stanford University. "Everybody's talking about it, but th
Citation Superstars
The Scientist Staff | Apr 15, 1990 | 4 min read
PERIODS 1965-78 AND 1973-84   NAME FIELDCITATIONS 1965-78 101. SCHLEYER P.v.R. Physical Chemistry 5,736 102. MASON D.T. Cardiology 5,700 103. McCONNELL H.M. Biophysics 5,697 104. LARAGH J.H. Cardiology 5,681 105. KIPNIS D.M. Cell Biology 5,676 106. SHERLOCK S. Gastroenterology 5,670 107. BRODIE B.B. Pharmacology 5,668 108.HABER E. Immunology 5,650 109. SINGER S.J. Cell Biology 5,647 110. WALLACH D.F.H. Oncology 5,623 111. STEWART R.F. Physics 5,611 112. MAIZEL J.V.
Sweet science
Megan Scudellari | Sep 15, 2010 | 4 min read
Ever had the urge to take a nice crunchy bite of Drosophila or lick icing off a brain? You will after a visit to linkurl:Not So Humble Pie,;http://notsohumblepie.blogspot.com/ a blog run by scientist-turned-baker, Ms. Humble. A blogger who refers to herself as "a typical nerdy biological anthropologist turned stay at home mom," Ms. Humble -- who chooses to remain anonymous -- began the blog in October 2009. Since then, the popular blog has regularly featured science-themed baked goods, from zebr
Among Review Journals, Biochemistry Serial Tops The List
Abigail Grissom | Mar 4, 1990 | 4 min read
For seven of the past 10 years, the Annual Review of Biochemistry has exhibited the highest impact of any review journal (or nonreview journal, for that matter) in the life sciences. In 1988, its impact rating stood at a towering 48.3, a figure well above the second ranking journal Pharmacological Reviews, which had a rating of 29.4. The accompanying table lists the top 10 review journals, according to their 1988 impact ratings. Impact figures are measures of how often the average article in a
Quantum Dots Get Smaller
Karen Heyman(kheyman@the-scientist.com) | May 8, 2005 | 6 min read
For all the hype about nanotechnology, sometimes small isn't quite small enough.
National Academy Bestows Honors On 18 Accomplished Researchers
Edward Silverman | Apr 27, 1997 | 8 min read
Eighteen accomplished researchers, including a 91-year-old endocrinologist who's known affectionately as "the George Burns of science," are being honored for their achievements at the 134th annual meeting of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), scheduled for April 28 in Washington, D.C. They will be feted during an event that will include the election of new academy members and the induction of members elected last year (T.W. Durso, The Scientist, May 27, 1996, page 3). The academy's highes

Run a Search

ADVERTISEMENT