The Scientist

» reproducibility

Most Recent

image: STAP Author Can’t Replicate Results

STAP Author Can’t Replicate Results

By | December 22, 2014

RIKEN’s Haruko Obokata fails to replicate stimulus-triggered acquisition of pluripotency.

0 Comments

image: Validating Antibodies: An Urgent Need

Validating Antibodies: An Urgent Need

By | December 1, 2014

Highlights from a webinar held by The Scientist to discuss the role of antibody validation and cataloging in improving data reproducibility

1 Comment

image: Epigenetics Paper Raises Questions

Epigenetics Paper Raises Questions

By | October 16, 2014

GENETICS publishes a commentary criticizing a Nature Neuroscience paper claiming that mice can inherit smell sensitivities that their parents acquired during life.

5 Comments

image: STAP Papers Retracted

STAP Papers Retracted

By | July 2, 2014

Nature issues retractions of the stimulus-triggered acquisition of pluripotency papers and pens an editorial on the controversy surrounding their publication.

0 Comments

image: Replication Gone Wrong

Replication Gone Wrong

By | May 29, 2014

Efforts to reproduce an experimental psychology study yield failure, accusations, and ultimately, discourse on how to improve the process.

0 Comments

image: Week in Review: April 28–May 2

Week in Review: April 28–May 2

By | May 2, 2014

Male scientists stress mice out; using SCNT to reprogram adult cells; acetate can reach mouse brain, reduce appetite; WHO sounds “post-antibiotic era” alarm

0 Comments

image: Researching Research

Researching Research

By | April 28, 2014

Stanford University starts new center to study how scientific research can be improved.

2 Comments

image: Dealing with Irreproducibility

Dealing with Irreproducibility

By | April 8, 2014

Researchers discuss the growing pressures that are driving increases in retraction rates at AACR.

5 Comments

image: Week in Review: March 31–April 4

Week in Review: March 31–April 4

By | April 4, 2014

Transcriptional landscape of the fetal brain; how a parasitic worm invades plants; difficulties reproducing “breakthrough” heart regeneration method; oxytocin and dishonesty

1 Comment

image: “Breakthrough” Tough to Reproduce

“Breakthrough” Tough to Reproduce

By | April 3, 2014

An independent group could not replicate the results of a highly cited heart regeneration protocol, while others say they have succeeded.  

6 Comments

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
BioCision
BioCision
Advertisement
PITTCON
PITTCON
Life Technologies