Fake peer reviews were submitted to Elsevier due to a glitch in the publisher's security system, resulting in the retraction of 11 papers.
Daily News Roundup
Fake peer reviews were submitted to Elsevier due to a glitch in the publisher's security system, resulting in the retraction of 11 papers.
NYU’s Langone Medical Center continues to struggle from the lasting impact of the 15-foot storm surge that accompanied the recent hurricane.
Organizations are calling for a common set of sign language for scientific terms.
Nominated as a write-in candidate as a protest against the anti-science incumbent, famed naturalist Charles Darwin won 4,000 congressional votes in a Georgia county.
More stories surface about how last week’s super storm is affecting research up and down the coast—and how science is fighting back.
The blogosphere voices widespread condemnation for a sexist comment made by a researcher attending this week’s annual Society for Neuroscience conference.
Both male and female researchers are less likely to hire a female candidate than a male candidate with the same experience.
As federal budgets tighten, the US government is getting serious about enforcing reporting and administrative rules that accompany academic grants.
A new study of the scientific literature finds that researchers are guilty of overemphasizing the benefits of medical treatments.
The federal agency is shuffling around its programs to streamline management and promote international scientific collaboration.