ADVERTISEMENT

404

Not Found

Is this what you were looking for?

tag opinion science publishing publishing ethics

peer review jif journal impact factor
Opinion: Stop Gaming Peer Review
Jens P. Goetze and Jens F. Rehfeld | Jun 6, 2019 | 3 min read
It is a violation of publishing ethics to use the peer review comments of one journal to mature a manuscript and submit to another with a higher impact factor.
Identifying Predatory Publishers
Tracy Vence | Jul 16, 2017 | 7 min read
How to tell reputable journals from shady ones
DNA molecule.
Finding DNA Tags in AAV Stacks
Mariella Bodemeier Loayza Careaga, PhD | Mar 7, 2024 | 8 min read
Ten years ago, scientists put DNA barcodes in AAV vectors, creating an approach that simplified, expedited, and streamlined AAV screening. 
Steps to End “Colonial Science” Slowly Take Shape
Ashley Yeager | Jan 1, 2021 | 10 min read
Scientists from countries with fewer resources are pushing collaborators from higher-income countries to shed biases and behaviors that perpetuate social stratification in the research community.
boycott petition elsevier academic scholarly publishing open access
Opinion: Boycotting Elsevier Is Not Enough
Shaun Khoo | Oct 22, 2019 | 4 min read
The publishing giant will likely survive the latest boycott by scientists. An overhaul is needed to make science publishing fair and open.
Science Ethics
Mark Frankel | Apr 26, 1992 | 2 min read
Although Lawrence Cranberg's opinion piece on plagiarism in science ("The Plague Of Plagiarism Persists In Modern Science," The Scientist, Feb. 3, 1992, page 11) included several useful insights, I must take exception to Cranberg's characterization of the American Association for the Advancement of Science's handling of its 1967 survey of members on ethics in science. While the results of the survey were never published, the report by Anatol Rapoport is available from my office. On the larger
Opinion: Academic Waste
Linda Feighery | Oct 17, 2013 | 3 min read
From funding to publishing, academic research needlessly burns through time and money.
Opinion: Honorary Authorship Is Antiquated Etiquette
Midhat H. Abdulreda | Oct 16, 2013 | 4 min read
Though the practice may be well-intentioned, naming courtesy authors can hurt science and scientists.
Opinion: Ethics Training in Science
James Hicks | May 14, 2013 | 4 min read
The NIH has required researchers to receive instruction about responsible conduct for more than 20 years, but misconduct is still on the rise.
Illustration of a person confused looking at a computer
When Researchers Sound the Alarm on Problematic Papers
Shawna Williams | Sep 1, 2021 | 10+ min read
Finding and reporting an irregularity in a published study can lead people down an unexpected path.

Run a Search

ADVERTISEMENT