A mysterious case of proteomics plagiarism leads to an odd timeline for a retraction.
Advertisement
The Scientist
Most Recent
The authors of a review article on genome-wide association studies have retracted the paper due to “substantial textual overlap” with other sources.
Authors retract a decade-old, highly-cited cancer study, admitting sloppy mistakes in the data analysis.
Researchers from Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine have retracted two papers involving colon cancer biomarkers.
A publisher bills authors $650 to retract a twice-published paper.
This year’s roundup of bad behavior in the life sciences and new initiatives to prevent misconduct
Contrary to previous studies, a new publication finds that most retractions from scholarly literature are not due to misconduct.
The journal that published and abruptly retracted the first study linking the lab-made virus XMRV to disease apologizes to the authors.
Grading journals on how well they share information with readers will help deliver accountability to an industry that often lacks it.
Follow The Scientist
Stay Connected with The Scientist
-
The Scientist Magazine
-
The Scientist Careers
-
Neuroscience Research Techniques
-
Genetic Research Techniques
-
Cell Culture Techniques
-
Microbiology and Immunology
-
Cancer Research and Technology
Current Issue
