A former University of Washington researcher did commit misconduct 10 years ago, according to the Office of Research Integrity.
The Scientist
Most Recent
A Japanese newspaper claims that the pharma giant funded flawed research that revealed extra health benefits for one of its top-selling drugs.
A mysterious case of proteomics plagiarism leads to an odd timeline for a retraction.
The authors of a review article on genome-wide association studies have retracted the paper due to “substantial textual overlap” with other sources.
Researchers from Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine have retracted two papers involving colon cancer biomarkers.
Two biomedical researchers have been found guilty of falsifying data.
A publisher bills authors $650 to retract a twice-published paper.
This year’s roundup of bad behavior in the life sciences and new initiatives to prevent misconduct
Contrary to previous studies, a new publication finds that most retractions from scholarly literature are not due to misconduct.
Follow The Scientist
Stay Connected with The Scientist
-
The Scientist Magazine
-
The Scientist Careers
-
Neuroscience Research Techniques
-
Genetic Research Techniques
-
Cell Culture Techniques
-
Microbiology and Immunology
-
Cancer Research and Technology
Current Issue
