Retracting a paper from the scientific literature can lead to fewer citations for related studies.
The Scientist
Most Recent
The journal that published and abruptly retracted the first study linking the lab-made virus XMRV to disease apologizes to the authors.
The journal PLOS Pathogens abruptly retracts the seminal paper linking XMRV to disease.
Grading journals on how well they share information with readers will help deliver accountability to an industry that often lacks it.
Editors at 23 scientific journals demand validation of nearly 200 studies authored by a Japanese anesthesiologist.
Michael Miller is found guilty of research misconduct, having misconstrued data in four NIH grants, two papers, and one manuscript.
A reanalysis of the study reporting genes linked to extremely long life, which was retracted from Science last summer, is published in PLoS ONE.
Science makes a decision for the authors and retracts a paper suggesting a viral cause for chronic fatigue syndrome.
The Dutch Psychologist who’s made headlines recently for a massive case of scientific fraud has a Science paper retracted.
Ten years after an investigative report found that 10 papers on sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) were “flawed,” only one has been pulled from the literature.
Follow The Scientist
Stay Connected with The Scientist
-
The Scientist Magazine
-
The Scientist Careers
-
Neuroscience Research Techniques
-
Genetic Research Techniques
-
Cell Culture Techniques
-
Microbiology and Immunology
-
Cancer Research and Technology
Current Issue
