A new study blames the unreliable nature of some research in the field on underpowered statistical analyses.
A new study blames the unreliable nature of some research in the field on underpowered statistical analyses.
A new analysis suggests that only 14 percent of published biomedical results are wrong, despite prominent opinions to the contrary.
How to get the most out of your collaboration with bioinformaticians
Prognostic signatures have become popular tools in cancer research, but it turns out signatures made of random genes are prognostic as well.
Statistician Paul Meier, who championed the random assignment of patients to treatment groups in clinical trials, changed the way the researchers test experimental drugs.
A new study of thousands of people in Europe quantifies the genetic underpinnings of intelligence, finding that some 50 percent of smarts stems from genes.
Large sample sizes are not the be-all and end-all of clinical research
Page 1 of 1