The Scientist

» statistics

Most Recent

image: BPTW: By the Numbers

BPTW: By the Numbers

By | August 1, 2013

Take a closer look at some of the statistics generated by The Scientist's Best Place to Work Academia 2013 survey.


image: Opinion: Statistical Misconceptions

Opinion: Statistical Misconceptions

By | July 31, 2013

Researchers must be wary of the common mistakes of correlation analysis when drawing conclusions about the nature of their data.


image: Worried Sick

Worried Sick

By | July 1, 2013

Expectations can make you ill. Fear can make you fragile. Understanding the nocebo effect may help prevent this painful phenomenon.


image: Bad Stats Plague Neuroscience

Bad Stats Plague Neuroscience

By | April 16, 2013

A new study blames the unreliable nature of some research in the field on underpowered statistical analyses.

1 Comment

image: Stats Are Right Most of the Time

Stats Are Right Most of the Time

By | January 28, 2013

A new analysis suggests that only 14 percent of published biomedical results are wrong, despite prominent opinions to the contrary.

1 Comment

image: A Little Help from My Friends

A Little Help from My Friends

By | July 1, 2012

How to get the most out of your collaboration with bioinformaticians


image: Opinion: Confounded Cancer Markers

Opinion: Confounded Cancer Markers

By | December 7, 2011

Prognostic signatures have become popular tools in cancer research, but it turns out signatures made of random genes are prognostic as well.


image: The Father of Trial Randomization Dies

The Father of Trial Randomization Dies

By | August 15, 2011

Statistician Paul Meier, who championed the random assignment of patients to treatment groups in clinical trials, changed the way the researchers test experimental drugs.


image: Heritability of Intelligence

Heritability of Intelligence

By | August 9, 2011

A new study of thousands of people in Europe quantifies the genetic underpinnings of intelligence, finding that some 50 percent of smarts stems from genes.


image: Q&A: Why small is beautiful

Q&A: Why small is beautiful

By | June 15, 2011

Large sample sizes are not the be-all and end-all of clinical research.


Popular Now

  1. Investigation Finds Pathologist Guilty of Systemic Misconduct
  2. Many Evolutionary Paths Lead to Same Bird Trait
  3. Common STD May Have Come from Neanderthals
  4. Bacteria and Humans Have Been Swapping DNA for Millennia