The Scientist

» statistics

Most Recent

image: Week in Review: October 13–17

Week in Review: October 13–17

By | October 17, 2014

Snail not extinct after all; results too good to be true?; mice need myelin production for motor learning; keeping the brain young; the evolution of archaea

0 Comments

image: Epigenetics Paper Raises Questions

Epigenetics Paper Raises Questions

By | October 16, 2014

GENETICS publishes a commentary criticizing a Nature Neuroscience paper claiming that mice can inherit smell sensitivities that their parents acquired during life.

5 Comments

image: Screen the Healthy?

Screen the Healthy?

By | March 12, 2014

In light of a study that showed blood-based biomarkers could predict future cognitive impairment, researchers discuss statistical analyses and the problem of false positives.

0 Comments

image: BPTW: By the Numbers

BPTW: By the Numbers

By | August 1, 2013

Take a closer look at some of the statistics generated by The Scientist's Best Place to Work Academia 2013 survey.

0 Comments

image: Opinion: Statistical Misconceptions

Opinion: Statistical Misconceptions

By | July 31, 2013

Researchers must be wary of the common mistakes of correlation analysis when drawing conclusions about the nature of their data.

3 Comments

image: Worried Sick

Worried Sick

By | July 1, 2013

Expectations can make you ill. Fear can make you fragile. Understanding the nocebo effect may help prevent this painful phenomenon.

3 Comments

image: Bad Stats Plague Neuroscience

Bad Stats Plague Neuroscience

By | April 16, 2013

A new study blames the unreliable nature of some research in the field on underpowered statistical analyses.

1 Comment

image: Stats Are Right Most of the Time

Stats Are Right Most of the Time

By | January 28, 2013

A new analysis suggests that only 14 percent of published biomedical results are wrong, despite prominent opinions to the contrary.

1 Comment

image: A Little Help from My Friends

A Little Help from My Friends

By | July 1, 2012

How to get the most out of your collaboration with bioinformaticians

2 Comments

image: Opinion: Confounded Cancer Markers

Opinion: Confounded Cancer Markers

By | December 7, 2011

Prognostic signatures have become popular tools in cancer research, but it turns out signatures made of random genes are prognostic as well.

39 Comments

Popular Now

  1. A Coral to Outlast Climate Change
  2. Antarctica Is Turning Green
  3. First In Vivo Human Genome Editing to Be Tested in New Clinical Trial
  4. How to Tell a Person’s “Brain Age”
AAAS