The Scientist

» science publishing

Most Recent

image: Fast-Track Peer Review Controversy

Fast-Track Peer Review Controversy

By | March 31, 2015

An editor of the journal Scientific Reports quits in protest of paid, expedited review.

4 Comments

image: Mass Retraction

Mass Retraction

By | March 27, 2015

BioMed Central retracts 43 papers it had been investigating for evidence of faked peer review.

1 Comment

image: HHS Rolls Out Public Access Plans

HHS Rolls Out Public Access Plans

By | March 3, 2015

The US Department of Health and Human Services outlines how the National Institutes of Health and its other agencies will make research results public.

0 Comments

image: Riding Out Rejection

Riding Out Rejection

By | March 1, 2015

How to navigate the choppy waters of scientific publication

9 Comments

image: <em>Nature</em> Debuts Peer-Review Option

Nature Debuts Peer-Review Option

By | February 18, 2015

Authors submitting to Nature journals can soon request double-blind reviews.

1 Comment

image: Truly Brief Communications

Truly Brief Communications

By | February 18, 2015

The Journal of Brief Ideas, a platform that publishes 200-word articles, launches in beta.

1 Comment

image: Lab Size Study Stirs Debate

Lab Size Study Stirs Debate

By | February 9, 2015

Do bigger labs churn out more high-impact papers? Not necessarily, according to a new analysis.

3 Comments

image: University of California Doubles Down on OA

University of California Doubles Down on OA

By | January 21, 2015

The academic institution’s press is launching two new open-access initiatives to make research results and academic manuscripts publicly available.

0 Comments

image: Opinion: Out With the Old

Opinion: Out With the Old

By | January 21, 2015

The research community doesn’t need more journals. It’s time we embrace non-traditional publishing platforms.

2 Comments

image: Science Publishing Mega-Merger

Science Publishing Mega-Merger

By | January 19, 2015

Macmillan Science and Education, the publisher of Nature and Scientific American, will join forces with Springer Science+Business Media.

0 Comments

Popular Now

  1. Opinion: Why I Published in a Predatory Journal
    News & Opinion Opinion: Why I Published in a Predatory Journal

    My “colleagues” and I at the fictitious Arthur Vandelay Urological Research Institute were surprised to find our bogus “uromycitisis” case report swiftly accepted, with only minor revisions requested.

  2. Consilience, Episode 3: Cancer, Obscured
  3. March for Science: Dispatches from Washington, DC
  4. Record-Setting Corn Grows 45 Feet Tall
AAAS