Advertisement

The Scientist

» publishing

Most Recent

image: Opinion: Honorary Authorship Is Antiquated Etiquette

Opinion: Honorary Authorship Is Antiquated Etiquette

By | October 16, 2013

Though the practice may be well-intentioned, naming courtesy authors can hurt science and scientists.

3 Comments

image: Useless Peer Review?

Useless Peer Review?

By | October 15, 2013

A study shows that the methods by which scientists evaluate each other’s work are error-prone and poor at measuring merit.

3 Comments

image: Fake Paper Exposes Failed Peer Review

Fake Paper Exposes Failed Peer Review

By | October 6, 2013

The widespread acceptance of an atrocious manuscript, fabricated by an investigative journalist, reveals the near absence of quality at some journals.

2 Comments

image: What to Do About “Clare Francis”

What to Do About “Clare Francis”

By | September 14, 2013

Anonymous tipsters who allege scientific misconduct can make journal editors squeamish. But should a whistleblower's identity matter?

7 Comments

image: U.S. Drops in Share of Publications

U.S. Drops in Share of Publications

By | September 12, 2013

New analysis reveals increased globalization of science, leading to a greater proportion of patents and papers coming out of developing countries.

0 Comments

image: Green OA Is Golden

Green OA Is Golden

By | September 10, 2013

A new report lauds the UK government’s commitment to open access, but calls its early devotion to the gold model a “mistake.”

2 Comments

image: Mea Culpa Retractions

Mea Culpa Retractions

By | August 30, 2013

Researchers earn applause after recalling two papers containing misinterpreted findings.

2 Comments

image: Exaggeration Nation

Exaggeration Nation

By | August 27, 2013

A new study finds behavioral researchers in the U.S. are prone to reporting extreme results.

3 Comments

image: Preserving Research

Preserving Research

By | August 1, 2013

The top online archives for storing your unpublished findings

1 Comment

image: Opinion: Reviewing Reviewers

Opinion: Reviewing Reviewers

By | July 19, 2013

Science needs a standard way to evaluate and reward journal reviewers.

1 Comment

Advertisement

Popular Now

  1. Most Earth-like Planet Found
  2. AAAAA Is for Arrested Translation
  3. Four-legged Snake Fossil Found
  4. The Sum of Our Parts
    Features The Sum of Our Parts

    Putting the microbiome front and center in health care, in preventive strategies, and in health-risk assessments could stem the epidemic of noncommunicable diseases.

Advertisement
Advertisement