The Scientist

» publishing

Most Recent

image: Publishing Data

Publishing Data

By | May 29, 2014

Nature’s publisher launches a new peer-reviewed, online-only journal that will accept descriptions of data sets.

0 Comments

image: Sloppy Notes Led to Goodall Plagiarism

Sloppy Notes Led to Goodall Plagiarism

By | April 1, 2014

Jane Goodall’s latest book was revised to eliminate plagiarism, which she blames on chaotic note-taking.  

0 Comments

image: PLOS Clarifies Data Policy

PLOS Clarifies Data Policy

By | March 11, 2014

Following the publisher’s announcement of an updated policy for the sharing of data underlying its open-access publications, PLOS apologizes for the confusion.

0 Comments

image: New <em>Science</em> Journal to Launch

New Science Journal to Launch

By | February 12, 2014

The American Association for the Advancement of Science, publisher of the journal Science, announces plans for a new digital open-access publication, Science Advances.

1 Comment

image: NIH Tackles Irreproducibility

NIH Tackles Irreproducibility

By | January 28, 2014

The federal agency speaks out about how to improve the quality of scientific research.

5 Comments

image: New Neuroscience Journal to Launch

New Neuroscience Journal to Launch

By | January 15, 2014

The publisher of The Journal of Neuroscience has laid out plans for an open-access, online-only journal for brain research.

1 Comment

image: Defining Legit Open Access Journals

Defining Legit Open Access Journals

By | December 20, 2013

Scholarly publishing organizations join forces to set standards for aboveboard open access journals.  

0 Comments

image: GMO Retraction Sparks Retribution

GMO Retraction Sparks Retribution

By | December 5, 2013

A journal faces a potential lawsuit and a boycott after retracting a study about genetically modified crops.

6 Comments

image: Opinion: Honorary Authorship Is Antiquated Etiquette

Opinion: Honorary Authorship Is Antiquated Etiquette

By | October 16, 2013

Though the practice may be well-intentioned, naming courtesy authors can hurt science and scientists.

3 Comments

image: Useless Peer Review?

Useless Peer Review?

By | October 15, 2013

A study shows that the methods by which scientists evaluate each other’s work are error-prone and poor at measuring merit.

3 Comments

Popular Now

  1. Exercise Boosts Telomere Transcription
  2. Classic Example of Symbiosis Revised
  3. The Genetic Components of Rare Diseases
  4. Orangutan Imitates Human Speech
RayBiotech