The Scientist

» journal

Most Recent

image: Pondering Science Publishing

Pondering Science Publishing

By | December 16, 2013

Panelists and attendees at the American Society for Cell Biology annual meeting considered the future of peer review and journal impact factors.

1 Comment

image: Opinion: Problems with Hidden COI

Opinion: Problems with Hidden COI

By | October 28, 2013

There may be much more to conflicts of interest than what gets declared.

0 Comments

image: Many Papers Lack Detailed Methods

Many Papers Lack Detailed Methods

By | September 6, 2013

Nearly half of scientific publications lack sufficient information about the research resources needed to reproduce experimental findings, a study finds.

0 Comments

image: Scientists Take Aim at Impact Factor

Scientists Take Aim at Impact Factor

By | May 20, 2013

A declaration asks the scientific community to put less weight on the metric, widely used to evaluate journals’ prestige.

2 Comments

image: Scientists Celebrate UK Libel Reform

Scientists Celebrate UK Libel Reform

By | April 29, 2013

New libel laws for England and Wales should help protect scientific debate, but campaigners worry that legal costs remain a threat.

1 Comment

image: Nature Announces Reproducibility Initiative

Nature Announces Reproducibility Initiative

By | April 25, 2013

The journal is sharpening its review of life science papers and giving authors additional space to document more detailed methods.

0 Comments

image: Is PubMed Hurting Scientific Journals?

Is PubMed Hurting Scientific Journals?

By | April 5, 2013

A study concludes that the open access repository is decreasing biomedical journal readership.

5 Comments

image: Disputed Research Ends in Tragedy

Disputed Research Ends in Tragedy

By | March 14, 2013

A biomedical researcher whose Nature paper was called into question was found dead in his lab.  

4 Comments

image: Cheap Impact?

Cheap Impact?

By | January 23, 2013

A new online tool allows researchers to compare open-access journal publication fees with article influence, and reveals that you don’t necessarily get what you pay for.

0 Comments

image: Opinion: Publish Negative Results

Opinion: Publish Negative Results

By , , and | January 15, 2013

Non-confirmatory or “negative” results are not worthless.

7 Comments

Popular Now

  1. Consilience, Episode 3: Cancer, Obscured
  2. RNAi’s Future in Drug-Target Screening
    News Analysis RNAi’s Future in Drug-Target Screening

    A recent CRISPR study contradicted years of RNA interference research on a well-studied cancer drug target. But is it the last nail in the coffin for RNAi as a screening tool? 

  3. A History of Screening for Natural Products to Fight Cancer
  4. Streakers, Poopers, and Performers: The Wilder Side of Wildlife Cameras
AAAS