postpublication peer review

The venue for post-publication peer review was not getting enough participation.

Lawyers involved discuss the latest twist in the ongoing litigation that pits pathologist Fazlul Sarkar against anonymous commenters on the post-publication peer review site.

In an attempt to avoid future subpoenas requesting potentially identifying information on unregistered users of the post-publication peer review website, the platform’s administrators have attempted to cease IP address collection.

Wellcome Open Research will enable immediate publication and transparent peer review.

The site’s lawyers, along with renowned scientists, filed briefs to an appeals court asking to protect a commenter’s identification.

A 2012 Cancer Cell paper is under investigation after users of the post-publication peer review website raised questions about the validity of Western blot images.

A look at this year’s most memorable retractions

PubPeer responds to criticism that anonymous post-publication peer review threatens the scientific process.

Neuroscientist Brandon Stell identifies himself as one of the creators of the post-publication peer review website, as he and his colleagues announce the nonprofit PubPeer Foundation.

In a defamation lawsuit involving anonymous comments on the post-publication peer review website, a judge requests potentially identifying information.

A Michigan judge denies a request to reveal the identities of commenters on the post-publication review website.

The research community doesn’t need more journals. It’s time we embrace non-traditional publishing platforms.

The stem cell that never was; post-publication peer review website faces legal trouble; biosecurity breaches at federal labs

A professor who was terminated from a new job before he’d even started is suing users of the post-publication peer review forum for allegedly making defamatory statements.

Scientists are taking to social media to challenge weak research, share replication attempts in real time, and counteract hype. Will this online discourse enrich the scientific process?