Advertisement

The Scientist

» peer review and developmental biology

Most Recent

image: Judge: PubPeer Users Remain Anonymous

Judge: PubPeer Users Remain Anonymous

By | March 6, 2015

A Michigan judge denies a request to reveal the identities of commenters on the post-publication review website.

2 Comments

image: <em>Nature</em> Debuts Peer-Review Option

Nature Debuts Peer-Review Option

By | February 18, 2015

Authors submitting to Nature journals can soon request double-blind reviews.

1 Comment

image: Scientific Publishing, 1665

Scientific Publishing, 1665

By | February 1, 2015

Henry Oldenburg founded Philosophical Transactions to share scholarly news from the “Ingenious in many considerable parts of the World.”

0 Comments

image: Opinion: Out With the Old

Opinion: Out With the Old

By | January 21, 2015

The research community doesn’t need more journals. It’s time we embrace non-traditional publishing platforms.

2 Comments

image: Assessing Research Productivity

Assessing Research Productivity

By , , and | January 1, 2015

A new way of evaluating academics’ research output using easily obtained data

2 Comments

image: Fertility Treatment Fallout

Fertility Treatment Fallout

By | January 1, 2015

Mouse offspring conceived by in vitro fertilization are metabolically different from naturally conceived mice.

7 Comments

image: Q&A: One Million Preprints and Counting

Q&A: One Million Preprints and Counting

By | December 29, 2014

A conversation with ArXiv founder Paul Ginsparg

0 Comments

image: NIH Study Canceled

NIH Study Canceled

By | December 15, 2014

The National Institutes of Health shutters its initiative to track the health of 100,000 children through adulthood.

3 Comments

image: PubPeer Pushes Back

PubPeer Pushes Back

By | December 11, 2014

The founders of the post-publication peer review website file a motion to quash an academic’s subpoena for user information.

0 Comments

image: Peer Review Manipulation?

Peer Review Manipulation?

By | November 26, 2014

BioMed Central says about 50 manuscripts in its systems may have been erroneously considered or accepted as a result of foul play.

1 Comment

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Biology Research
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
Advertisement