The agency told a Congressional committee that it would not forward peer-reviewer comments of social science grants the committee had requested.
Advertisement
The Scientist
Most Recent
The case of the Danish Cohort
The National Institutes of Health is weighing a peer-review system where grant proposals, even ones being resubmitted, would be treated as new.
In the latest effort to boost publication records, researchers are writing positive peer reviews for their work under other scientists’ names.
As a new age in scholarly publishing dawns, improved standards for openness in communicating scientific information promise to eliminate biases and publication delays.
As we stand on the brink of a new scientific age, how researchers should best communicate their findings and innovations is hotly debated in the publishing trenches.
Will traditional scientific journals follow newspapers into oblivion?
A member of an Italian journal’s editorial board resigns in protest of a paper denying the link between HIV and AIDs.
A new social network provides a novel forum for science publishing and peer review.
An attempt to regrow the infamous GFAJ-1 bacteria, reported to incorporate arsenic into its DNA backbone, has failed.
Follow The Scientist
Advertisement
Stay Connected with The Scientist
-
The Scientist Magazine
-
The Scientist Careers
-
Neuroscience Research Techniques
-
Genetic Research Techniques
-
Cell Culture Techniques
-
Microbiology and Immunology
-
Cancer Research and Technology
Current Issue
