The Scientist

» impact factor

Most Recent

image: Opinion: On “The Impact Factor Fallacy”

Opinion: On “The Impact Factor Fallacy”

By , , and | March 21, 2017

Papers published in low-impact journals are not necessarily low-quality scientific contributions.

1 Comment

image: Scientometrics Pioneer Eugene Garfield Dies

Scientometrics Pioneer Eugene Garfield Dies

By | February 27, 2017

Eugene Garfield, founder of the Institute for Scientific Information and The Scientist, has passed away at age 91.

5 Comments

image: TS Picks: Remembering Eugene Garfield

TS Picks: Remembering Eugene Garfield

By | February 27, 2017

A look back at the contributions of The Scientist’s founder, scientometrics pioneer Eugene Garfield (1925–2017)

1 Comment

image: Elsevier’s Answer to the Impact Factor

Elsevier’s Answer to the Impact Factor

By | December 9, 2016

“CiteScore,” which ranks twice as many journals compared with publications assigned impact factors, makes its debut during a contentious time for journal metrics.

1 Comment

image: Opinion: The Impact Factor, Re-envisioned

Opinion: The Impact Factor, Re-envisioned

By , , and | November 18, 2016

A combination of the traditional metric and the newer h5 index potentiates the scientific community toward more-balanced evaluation. 

2 Comments

Could the Relative Citation Ratio replace the oft maligned journal impact factor?

0 Comments

image: Ditching Impact Factors for Deeper Data

Ditching Impact Factors for Deeper Data

By | July 7, 2016

A team of editors and researchers calls on journal publishers to use citation distributions as measures of publication quality rather than relying on much-derided impact factors.

0 Comments

image: Speaking of Science

Speaking of Science

By | February 1, 2016

February 2016's selection of notable quotes

1 Comment

image: Report: Diversity Strengthens Publications

Report: Diversity Strengthens Publications

By | February 25, 2014

US scientists are more likely to coauthor papers with researchers of similar ethnicity to themselves, but manuscripts with a more diverse list of authors have greater impact, a study shows.

0 Comments

image: Opinion: Measuring Impact

Opinion: Measuring Impact

By | February 24, 2014

Scientists must find a way to estimate the seemingly immeasurable impact of their research efforts.

3 Comments

Popular Now

  1. So You’ve Been Mistaken as a White Nationalist
  2. Opinion: We Need a Replacement for Beall’s List
  3. Trump Releases Science Spending Priorities for FY2019
  4. Seeding the Gut Microbiome Prevents Sepsis in Infants
AAAS