Courtesy of Oak Ridge National Laboratory
The poplar, "Stumpy," has been domesticated for biomass production in the same way corn and other crops have been bred for increased yield. Advanced biotechnology can reduce stem length to make the trunk shorter and thicker, reduce the number of branches and leaves, increase growth rate, improve adaptation to hostile climates, reduce negative response to competition, increase carbon sequestration, and improve the partitioning of biomass into components more favorable for subsequent conversion.
The completion of the Human Genome Project (HGP) symbolizes the entry of biology into the "big science" arena. What constitutes big science may be in the eye of the beholder, but the term generally means using high technology on a large scale and mobilizing substantial teams to tackle problems in a highly organized and structured way. This is an exciting time and there is much talk, mostly justified, that this new century will be the century of biology.
For obvious reasons the major focus of this new biology has been on medicine and human health. Faster and cheaper sequencing and genotyping are expected to usher in an age of early diagnostics, individually tailored treatments, and effective gene therapies. But another quiet revolution is taking place in biotechnology for energy, industrial, and environmental applications. Although some preliminary attempts had been made in the past, for example in bioremediation, the tools were never adequate to tackle problems in a rigorous way.
I am very bullish about what the new biotechnology can deliver for the principal missions of the US Department of Energy. With the proper investments in the basic research for this new biotechnology, I believe we can deliver powerful solutions to vexing problems of energy and environmental security by creating new sources of clean energy and more effective tools for environmental cleanup.
TAKING THE LEAD
The DOE is credited for launching the HGP, and as a founding member of the International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium, determined the sequences of chromosomes 5, 16, and 19. The DOE also established the Microbial Genome Program (MGP), which since 1995 has supported microbial biology research and sequenced nearly 200 microbial and related genomes and 12 microbial community genomes. Much of the DOE's success of its relatively modest biological program rested on its position within the behemoths of the physical sciences, including scientific computing. That close relationship emboldened the DOE biology managers to access many of the physical and computational science tools that helped fuel this revolution.
With the completion of the HGP and the evolution of the MGP, the new engine of the DOE's biotechnology effort is the Genomes To Life (GTL) program. Conceived and designed by our scientific advisors, GTL is a joint undertaking by the biology and high-performance computing science offices of the DOE. GTL focuses primarily on microbes and microbial communities and is aimed at applications of clean energy production, bioremediation of mixed (radioactive and chemical) wastes, and enhanced carbon sequestration by the biosphere.
The scientific focus of GTL is on the multiprotein molecular machines within cells and the regulatory networks that drive them. All experimental and high-end computing efforts are driving toward a robust predictive capability that can help design the systems that will deliver applications important to the DOE. Existing and new tools will be absolutely necessary to realize the GTL goals, including the DOE sequencing factory at Walnut Creek, Calif.; the X-ray, neutron, and nuclear magnetic resonance sources; the DOE supercomputers; and a new generation of proposed user facilities such as those for protein and molecular tag production, imaging, and proteomics.
Launched in 2002 with current funding at $68 million per year, GTL funds large multidiscipline, multi-institution teams that are self-organizing and adopting a big-science approach to specific problems they are tackling. Although still relatively new, GTL is showing tremendous promise both for breakthroughs of intrinsic scientific value as well as for delivering on the DOE missions within reasonable time frames. Among several worthy examples of GTL and related projects, I will briefly describe three that in many ways have motivated my bullishness about the potential for this program.
CLEANUP, ENERGY, AND SEQUESTRATION
Derek Lovley at University of Massachusetts at Amherst and his team focus on microbial
The second example comes from the laboratory of the J. Craig Venter Science Foundation. Venter and his team are inventing ways to produce a synthetic genome.2 Having achieved their goal for a virus, they now have their sights set on a microbial genome. One of their objectives is to synthesize the "minimal" microbial genome in order to focus investigations solely on aspects of microbial biochemistry that are of interest to GTL. Creating the minimal genome of a hydrogen-producing extremophile, for example, may provide valuable insights into ways to produce hydrogen on an industrial scale.
CONVERSION FOR FERMENTATION:
Courtesy of Michael Himmel
Cellulases are a broad family of enzymes that convert cellulose to glucose. The exoglucanase starts at a nick in the cellulose and proceeds down the track, converting the polysaccharide to double glucose molecules that are then split by another cellulase. The exoglucanase has three distinct domains: catalytic, linker peptide, and binding domains. The binding domain on the right extracts the track of polysaccharide from the cellulose and presents it to the active reaction site within the catalytic domain (From M. Himmel et al., "Cellulase Animation," run time 11 min., National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colo, 2000, doi:MRI PAU2-568-354)
The third example started at the DOE Joint Genome Institute with the sequencing of a
Such advances may soon aid in realizing a consolidated bioprocessing system for the creation of ethanol as described by analyst Charles Mann in his report to the National Commission on Energy Policy.5 This system would move several processes associated with biomass to ethanol production into a single (genetically modified) organism that both breaks down the cellulose and other biomass constituents into sugars and ferments the sugars to ethanol. Mann estimates that this could increase the conversion efficiency from 36% to 70%.
Steven J. Smith and colleagues at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in Richland, Wash., describe how the generation of bioethanol may evolve over a decade, leading to the displacement of 35 billion gallons of gasoline per year without impact on land currently dedicated to food production. If Mann's suggested improvements can be made by 2020, this technology could displace 22% of U.S petroleum imports.5
Although there is no experience yet comparing the cost and effectiveness of bioremediation of metals and radionuclides with traditional methods, costs savings for bioremediation of organics are estimated to range from 30% to 95%. In situ bioremediation, taking advantage of natural microbial populations in the subsurface, has the potential for reducing costs and increasing the efficiency of groundwater treatment as compared to conventional pump-and-treat technology. More than one billion cubic meters of water and 55 million cubic meters of solid media at the DOE sites in 29 states are contaminated with radionuclides. Cost estimates for restoration of these sites start at about $200 billion, so the potential savings accrued by use of innovative technologies may amount to many billions of dollars.6
Fast-growing biomass plantations will take advantage of biotechnology to increase the efficiency of biomass production without constraining the production of food and fiber. An additional benefit will be the augmentation of greenhouse-gas mitigation through increased carbon sequestration in the soils of these managed terrestrial ecosystems. Stan Wullschleger at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee estimates that by increasing the lignin concentration of roots, thereby increasing the turnover time, an additional 0.35 GtC/year (gigatons of carbon-per-year) could be sequestered globally during a 30-year poplar rotation.
Although some genetic engineering may be pursued in laboratory studies, it is entirely possible that no genetically engineered organism will ultimately be released to the environment for the GTL-derived applications. Through environmental genomics we are discovering such diversity in nature's tool-kit that it may suffice to simply "pick and choose and encourage" natural systems to realize the GTL applications in energy and environment. Advances such as the ones described are indicative of the acceleration in scientific innovation fueled by high-throughput processes. I believe that GTL can be the engine for innovation.
Aristides Patrinos is the director for biological and environmental research in the Office of Science at the US Department of Energy. He led the DOE effort in the Human Genome Project as well as the expanded DOE program in the study of global environmental change. More information about Genomes To Life can be found at
He can be contacted at