History matters

A return to ancestral conditions can result in evolutionary reversal, but it is not inevitable.

By | November 28, 2000

If you thought the incubation time of prion infections made for tediously long experiments, save a thought for Teotónio and Rose. As they report in the 23 November Nature, their experiment in fly evolution has been running for 20 years, and now the verdict is in: evolution can be, but is not always reversible (Nature 2000, 408:463-466). Over 100 or more generations, Teotónio and Rose selected flies for survival under starvation conditions, or for reproduction near the beginning, middle or end of their lifespan. Then the different fly populations were returned to their ancestral conditions for 50 generations. Some of the assayed phenotypes returned completely to the values seen at the start of the experiment, but in other cases there was either no significant change, or an initial rapid reversion followed by stalling of evolution, without full convergence to ancestral values. Thus reverse evolution is neither inevitable nor impossible; it is contingent. The failure of full reversal did not appear to be caused by a lack of genetic diversity, as hybrid populations showed similar evolutionary patterns. Instead, the pressure for evolutionary reversal appears to vary depending on the evolved characteristics of each derived population.

Popular Now

  1. A Coral to Outlast Climate Change
  2. Antarctica Is Turning Green
  3. How to Tell a Person’s “Brain Age”
  4. Life Science Funding Cuts Leaked
    The Nutshell Life Science Funding Cuts Leaked

    According to a document posted online less than a day before the release of the official 2018 budget proposal, the National Institutes of Health could face even deeper cuts than previously suggested by the Trump administration.