Chromatin Immunoprecipitation

Credit: RENATO PARO Early in the summer of 1991, Valerio Orlando, a postdoc in Renato Paro's lab at the University of Heidelberg, began working on the problem of identifying where proteins bind to chromatin in vivo. Researchers had already figured out how to determine whether a particular protein bound to a specific sequence in vitro. But what about protein occupancy in a living cell?

By | May 1, 2006

<figcaption> Credit: RENATO PARO</figcaption>
Credit: RENATO PARO

Early in the summer of 1991, Valerio Orlando, a postdoc in Renato Paro's lab at the University of Heidelberg, began working on the problem of identifying where proteins bind to chromatin in vivo. Researchers had already figured out how to determine whether a particular protein bound to a specific sequence in vitro. But what about protein occupancy in a living cell?

Orlando and Paro's idea was simple: Crosslink protein-DNA complexes using formaldehyde, immunoprecipitate with an antibody to the protein of interest, reverse the crosslink to release the purified sequences, and then use that DNA to probe a Southern blot of potential binding sites. But the technique, called chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), wasn't working very well, Paro says. "After the crosslink and immunoprecipitation, we realized we would only have very little DNA material left, and this would not be sufficient to do Southern hybridization." So on June 1, 1992, the pair discussed adding a linker-mediated PCR amplification step to the protocol, as shown in this page from Orlando's lab notebook.

"This is the crucial step in the ChIP process, to amplify the material," says Paro. Orlando and Paro first used the technique to map Polycomb-binding sequences in the Drosophila bithorax complex. In the March 19, 1993, Southern analysis shown in the inset, Orlando and Paro had not yet optimized conditions, as they still have vector sequence background, visible as a high molecular weight doublet in most lanes. They published those results later that year in Cell (75:1187-98, 1993).

Today, more than 2,400 papers have been published using ChIP, and it has become a key technique in the study of chromatin remodeling - the subject of a feature story on page 34. Many researchers modified the original protocol, replacing Paro's global amplification step with one that asks only whether a particular sequence is occupied. But now, with the application of ChIP to microarrays, the global amplification step is back, says Paro: "Everything old is new again."

jperkel@the-scientist.com

Popular Now

  1. Gut Microbes Linked to Neurodegenerative Disease
  2. Opinion: WHO’s Silence on Cannabis
  3. Top 10 Innovations 2016
    Features Top 10 Innovations 2016

    This year’s list of winners celebrates both large leaps and small (but important) steps in life science technology.

  4. Image of the Day: Parting Ways
    Image of the Day Image of the Day: Parting Ways

    The Allen Institute for Cell Science releases the first public collection of human induced pluripotent stem cells that have been fluorescently tagged using CRISPR.

Rockland