Study the economic impact of research? Win $5,000

As I found in my reporting of a July feature called linkurl:"Is science a good bet,";http://www.the-scientist.com/toc/2007/7/1/ it is a daunting task to figure out the economic impacts of investing in research. For decades economists have tried, but they've managed only to eke out a fuzzy sense of direction?meaning that the impact is positive, but no one really knows how positive, nor what an optimal investment might return.

By | August 7, 2007

As I found in my reporting of a July feature called linkurl:"Is science a good bet,";http://www.the-scientist.com/toc/2007/7/1/ it is a daunting task to figure out the economic impacts of investing in research. For decades economists have tried, but they've managed only to eke out a fuzzy sense of direction?meaning that the impact is positive, but no one really knows how positive, nor what an optimal investment might return. Yet the economics of research are of huge interest to the government, the scientific community, industry, taxpayers, and The Scientist's founder, Eugene Garfield. Each year he (through Research!America) gives out a $5,000 thank you to exceptional economists who dare enter the murky waters of research economics. Previous winners include the University of Chicago's Kevin Murphy and Robert Topel, whose work estimated that trillions of dollars are added to the economy from lives saved from recent medical breakthroughs. The window for nominations has been extended until August 15th, and winners will be announced in October. Any economists you think deserve the award? Let us know by commenting on this blog or vote for your favorite economist linkurl:here;http://www.researchamerica.org/ .

Popular Now

  1. Monsanto Buys Rights to CRISPR
    The Nutshell Monsanto Buys Rights to CRISPR

    The US agribusiness secures a global, nonexclusive licensing agreement from the Broad Institute to use the gene-editing technology for agricultural applications.

  2. How Plants Evolved Different Ways to Make Caffeine
  3. ESP on Trial
    Foundations ESP on Trial

    In the 1930s, parapsychologist Joseph Banks Rhine aimed to use scientific methods to confirm the existence of extrasensory perception, but faced criticisms of dubious analyses and irreproducible results.

  4. Another DNA Vaccine for Zika Shows Promise
RayBiotech