Big tobacco stubs out research money

Big tobacco is pulling its money out of academic research -- kind of. Tobacco company Philip Morris told researchers in September of last year that it was ending its controversial extramural research program, Science linkurl:reported;http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/319/5867/1173a today. But some funding from the company remains. The news of the ended sponsorship spread this month when University of California President Robert Dynes noted in a February 5 letter to the UC chancell

By | February 29, 2008

Big tobacco is pulling its money out of academic research -- kind of. Tobacco company Philip Morris told researchers in September of last year that it was ending its controversial extramural research program, Science linkurl:reported;http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/319/5867/1173a today. But some funding from the company remains. The news of the ended sponsorship spread this month when University of California President Robert Dynes noted in a February 5 letter to the UC chancellors that the tobacco company had ended its research program. The Philip Morris extramural research program has sponsored 470 research proposals in the US. Funding from tobacco companies has been banned by several research institutions and was much contested by some participating campuses at the University of California, where their sponsorship has amounted to some $16 million. The university chancellors and faculty went back and forth several times, beginning in 2004, on whether to ban research money from tobacco companies (read more linkurl:here).;http://www.the-scientist.com/templates/trackable/display/news.jsp?type=news_url=news/display/44525&id=44525 In October of linkurl:last year,;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/53711/ the university decided to allow tobacco companies to sponsor research. Stanton Glantz, UC San Francisco professor, and outspoken supporter of the debated bans, told Science that Philip Morris recently awarded a $6 million grant to UCLA neuroscientist linkurl:Edythe London.;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/54287/

Popular Now

  1. Broad Wins CRISPR Patent Interference Case
    Daily News Broad Wins CRISPR Patent Interference Case

    The USPTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board has ruled in favor of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard retaining intellectual property rights covered by its patents for CRISPR gene-editing technology.

  2. Henrietta Lacks’s Family Seeks Compensation
  3. Humans Never Stopped Evolving
    Features Humans Never Stopped Evolving

    The emergence of blood abnormalities, an adult ability to digest milk, and changes in our physical appearance point to the continued evolution of the human race.

  4. Abundant Sequence Errors in Public Databases
Business Birmingham