The drama of biology is played out through thousands of protein-protein interactions. Historically, researchers could only examine these interactions one by one, but genomic sequences and high throughput methods have opened up the "interactome" - the complete list of all protein interactions in an organism.
With a sequenced eukaryotic genome, lists of every protein, and genetic amenability, Saccharomyces cerevisiae was an obvious model with which to examine cell-wide protein interactions. In 2000, Peter Uetz and colleagues, then at the University of Washington, made the first attempt at systematically mapping protein-protein interactions in yeast, reporting 957 putative interactions from 1,004 yeast proteins.
A smattering of similar studies soon followed, but they shared a flaw: the use of expression vectors that overproduced tagged proteins. It became clear that future work needed to maintain endogenous protein levels, says Jack Greenblatt, from the University of Toronto.
In 2006, back-to-back Hot Papers did this using tandem affinity purification
(TAP). The method involves inserting a 'tag' by homologous recombination at one end
of every yeast gene, with resulting proteins purified and identified by mass
spectrometry. Tagged proteins pull down complexes of interacting proteins that
together give a broad view of the interactome. Giulio Superti-Furga's group at
Cellzome and colleagues tagged all 6,466 open reading frames in S.
cerevisiae, purified 1,993 unique proteins, and found 257 novel protein
"The two studies are definitely milestones," says Uetz, who is now at The J. Craig Venter Institute and was not involved in either Hot Paper. Researchers have gone on to scrutinize some novel complexes, expand their efforts to map still unknown protein complexes, and continue to debate the biological relevance of the uncovered interactions.
The TAP method has complications. Protein complexes can vary in composition depending on which tagged proteins researchers use for purification, because experimental conditions can vary, and the effect of the tag on different proteins can vary. And proteins can also be part of several different complexes. Plus, "most of the yeast proteins were forming protein complexes," says Anne-Claude Gavin, first author of the Superti-Furga study. "This seemed to be the rule rather than the exception." Add it up and researchers need to interpret raw mass spectrometry data to determine which proteins are truly parts of a protein complex.
Illustrating this, despite the similar methodology used by the Hot Papers,
"the outcomes were surprisingly different," Uetz says. In a comparison of the two,
he found only six identical protein complexes.
However, "most of the divergence turned out not to be in the mass
spectrometry data," says Greenblatt, but in the mathematical models. Greenblatt and
his colleagues later compared both sets of raw purification data with a novel
approach based on the hierarchical clustering of protein-protein interactions and
strength of protein interactions, finding greater agreement between the
Despite the discrepancies, the genome-wide interaction data has proved
insightful. For example, Greenblatt's study uncovered the yeast histone
acetyltransferase Rtt109 in a novel complex with histone chaperone Vps75. Previous
genetic studies showed that Rtt109 works with the chaperone Asf1, "raising the
question of why Vps75 is associated with [Rtt109]," says Greenblatt. Recently, the
group found that Rtt109 needs Vps75 to carry out a novel histone
Tip of the interactome
A good deal of uncharted territory on yeast protein complexes still exists, says Stephen Michnick, from the University of Montreal. Michnick chalks this up to technical issues, notably that extraction conditions are not always optimal. But, "the point of these large-scale studies isn't to be comprehensive," he says, "but to get a general idea about the overall organization of protein interaction networks and what it tells us about the way the cell works."
Michnick's group recently developed a protein-fragment complementation assay
(PCA) to examine protein-protein interactions in vivo. Where other techniques give
physical interactions, PCAs can be used to study changes in interactions in intact
cells. "We wanted to be able to see the dynamics of these interactions under
particular conditions," says Michnick. In a genome-wide screen in yeast, they found
2,770 interactions involving 1,124 proteins, 80% of which had never been
Recent studies estimate the number of yeast protein-protein interactions to