Advertisement

Is systematic biology dead?

linkurl:Systematics;http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/13070/ and linkurl:taxonomy,;http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/22424/ sciences involved with identifying and organizing living things into distinct groups and establishing the relationships between those groups, are in serious danger of going extinct, according to a linkurl:report;http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldselect/ldsctech/162/162.pdf released last month by a committee focused on science in the

By | September 8, 2008

linkurl:Systematics;http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/13070/ and linkurl:taxonomy,;http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/22424/ sciences involved with identifying and organizing living things into distinct groups and establishing the relationships between those groups, are in serious danger of going extinct, according to a linkurl:report;http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldselect/ldsctech/162/162.pdf released last month by a committee focused on science in the British Parliament. "We have concluded that the state of systematics and taxonomy in the UK, both in terms of the professional taxonomic community and volunteers, is unsatisfactory - in some areas, such as mycology, to the point of crisis - and that more needs to be done to ensure the future health of the discipline," the report, issued by the linkurl:House of Lords' Science and Technology Committee,;http://www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/science_and_technology_committee/about_the_committee.cfm reads. It's not just an academic issue: Systematics and taxonomy are crucial for identifying potentially harmful species of insect, linkurl:fungi,;http://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/52853/ or plant, fully understanding linkurl:ecosystem services;http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/23277/ analyses, and tracking and combating linkurl:climate change,;http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/54049/ among other roles. "A decline in taxonomy and systematics in the UK would directly and indirectly impact on the Government's ability to deliver across a wide range of policy goals," the report reads. The warning echoes concerns I heard while reporting a linkurl:story;http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/53881/ on DNA barcoding last year. Several barcoders told me that the taxonomic experts, whom they rely upon to carefully confirm their molecularly-based identifications through good old-fashioned morphometrics and taxonomy, were literally dying off. I was told of grizzled and disappearing veterans of taxonomy such as linkurl:Montgomery Wood,;http://www.canacoll.org/Diptera/Staff/Wood/Wood.htm a Canadian octogenarian and one of the last experts in identifying linkurl:tachinid flies;http://www.geocities.com/brisbane_flies/TACHINIDAE.htm (Family Tachinidae). "It's a matter of changing trends in what's fashionable in universities," linkurl:David Hawksworth,;http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=43323 renowned British mycologist and former director of the linkurl:International Mycological Institute,;http://www.ima-mycology.org/ told __The Scientist__. UK universities no longer offer strong programs in systematic biology, added Hawksworth, who also contributed written evidence to the Science and Technology Committee report. UK mycologists in particular are becoming a dying breed. According to Hawksworth, the International Mycological Institute predicts that there will be no professional mycologists, well-versed in fungal taxonomy, left in the UK by 2012. "Expertise is going to peter out, and it's already petering out," he said. "It's a very sad feeling." As outlined in the report, Hawksworth said that the UK needed a governmental department or an interdepartmental committee to coordinate systematic biology expertise and prompt universities to invest more resources toward supporting systematics and taxonomy. The report also suggested constructing a roadmap for Internet-based taxonomy, taking a census of taxonomists in the UK, and solidifying the importance of funding taxonomic projects in the country. "I don't think there's any quick fix," Hawksworth said. "It's going to be a long haul." The situation isn't much brighter on this side of the pond, according to Canadian DNA barcoder linkurl:Paul Hebert;http://www.the-scientist.com/2007/12/1/40/1/ at the University of Guelph in Ontario. "The taxonomic freefall in the UK is not unique; taxonomy is in a similarly critical situation here," Hebert wrote in an Email to __The Scientist__. "Despite possessing the world's longest coastline, Canada has no marine fish taxonomist. Despite possessing more than a million lakes, we have lost our taxonomic specialists for most major groups of freshwater invertebrates. Despite our massive arctic territories, we have no taxonomic workforce dedicated to the study of polar life." __(Editors Note - 09/08/09: The original version of this story stated that Montgomery Wood was an expert in identifying North American black flies [Family Simuliidae]. This has been changed to reflect the fact that Wood is the foremost global expert in tachinid fly [Family Tachinidae] taxonomy. Though he is expert in the taxonomy of both families, his true specialty is tachinids.)__
Advertisement

Comments

Avatar of: David Yew

David Yew

Posts: 2

September 8, 2008

The same goes for many of the "classical" branches of biological sciences. The old teachers and the remaining hardline researchers in these fields are going into extinction, suffering often from the lack of appreciation and funding. These fields are in fact vital to the foundation of Biology and Health Sciences and their downfall or even extinction will have a great impact to the human community and will influence the scientific society in the ages to come.
Avatar of: Mohammad Islam

Mohammad Islam

Posts: 1

June 8, 2009

I have read the news and comments too, which is a fact in this advance world of science where everything is going forward on the basis of molecular analysis! And thats causing a huge competion to classical research like those who works on phenotype based systematics and taxonomy! On the other hand sequence based analysis of texa are very attractive and more reliable in most cases where phenotype based texonomy failed to, which intern forcing the funding agencies to divert from classical to molecular biologist, but, a country like Bangladesh, where, GoB gives a very small research grants for all sectors of scientific research, Department of Botany, University of Dhaka is still continuing their research and reporting new specices every year. Though they don't have enough funding they are still carrying out their efforts to enrich the basket of systematcis and taxonomy.

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
Advertisement
Life Technologies