Advertisement

Single neuron power

Training the brain to control a single neuron 's activation could restore motion in paralyzed limbs, according to a study to be published tomorrow in linkurl:__Nature.__;http://www.nature.com/news/2008/081015/full/news.2008.1170.html The study represents a novel approach for developing neuroprosthetics. "This paper demonstrates that simple methods can be very useful," said Leigh Hochberg, a clinician and researcher at Brown University and other institutions, who was not involved with the study.

By | October 15, 2008

Training the brain to control a single neuron 's activation could restore motion in paralyzed limbs, according to a study to be published tomorrow in linkurl:__Nature.__;http://www.nature.com/news/2008/081015/full/news.2008.1170.html The study represents a novel approach for developing neuroprosthetics. "This paper demonstrates that simple methods can be very useful," said Leigh Hochberg, a clinician and researcher at Brown University and other institutions, who was not involved with the study. Previous attempts at designing neuroprosthetics have focused on decoding the activity of a group of neurons associated with movement. Chet Moritz and colleagues from the University of Washington, however, went for individual cells --- by teaching monkeys to control the firing of a single neuron in their motor cortex, using biofeedback in order to power electrodes implanted in a paralyzed hand. The work fuses two different approaches in neuroprosthetic design -- direct muscle stimulation and brain-machine interfaces. Robert Kirsch and Hunter Peckham and others at the Cleveland Functional Electrical Stimulation Center at Case Western Reserve University have been working on linkurl:implanting electrodes;http://fescenter.org/index.php into muscles surrounding paralyzed limbs, allowing humans to perform tasks like standing, walking, or reaching out and grasping a cup. Meanwhile, in the BrainGate project, Hochberg, John Donoghue and colleagues implanted electrodes directly into the brain of a linkurl:paralyzed man,;http://www.cyberkineticsinc.com/content/clinicaltrials/braingate_trials.jsp allowing him to control a computer cursor and a robotic arm. "We use the simplest possible conversion from nerve activity to muscle activity," Moritz told The Scientist. They avoided using complex algorithm to interpret averaged neuronal activity, because averaged information "could confuse the patient." The researchers implanted sensors into the brains of two monkeys to record the activity of individual neurons within the motor cortex. These recordings were routed to computers outside of the monkey's body, which translated the brain signals into electrical impulses that activated electrodes implanted into muscles in the monkey's wrist. The researchers then temporarily paralyzed the animals' wrists with anaesthetic -- the only way the monkeys could move the muscles that activated their wrists was to learn to control those electrical pulses. The reward for successfully controlling the brain-to-wrist muscle connection: applesauce. It took the monkeys between 10 to 30 minutes to gain control of a single neuron while doing the task; not only were they able to control their muscle contraction, but the monkeys were also able to control the force of that contraction by regulating neuron firing rates. Surprisingly, the biofeedback training also worked for motor cortex neurons that didn't normally control wrist movement, said Moritz. "We found that the motor neuron system is remarkable in learning to use this system." Moritz estimated that it will take about five to ten years before the technology is ready for human trials. First, the sensor will have to be made fully implantable (in the monkeys, part of the electrode stuck through the skin to allow researcher to manipulate it). Also, due to the brain's natural movement and the build-up of scar tissue, implanted sensors usually lose connection to their target neurons within a few weeks, at best. Researchers are working on a new generation of sensors that would keep the connection longer or move to a new neuron when a connection is lost. Another major hurdle, said Moritz, will be to scale up the system to be able to control more muscles, thus increasing movement complexity. That means users would have to practice "each day for several hours," in order to make some of those brain-muscle associations automatic. "You can only pay attention to about seven things at once," he said.
Advertisement

Comments

Avatar of: Homayon Azizi

Homayon Azizi

Posts: 7

October 16, 2008

It would be more interesting to see if this method can be applied to human beings sooner rather than waiting for 5-10 years.
Avatar of: Donald Duck

Donald Duck

Posts: 39

October 20, 2008

This is why I love the scientist. You get to hear about random technologies and techniques that, instead of reflecting the present, present the future. There is too much demand and practical use for this kind of technology for it remain a novelty, like the flying car.\n\nUntil now, most sci-fi writers speculated that humans augmented with computers would be the result of understanding the brain, but I disagree. It appears as if the opposite is happening: the more we understand about augmentation, the more we rely on the brain's ability to figure things out. \n\nImagine the future: texting minus the sore thumb at at least twice the speed a thumb moves. Imagine body piercings that have a legitamate use. I don't know if these guys will get close to making this kind of stuff, but the first guy who does will become a multi-billionair.
Avatar of: anonymous poster

anonymous poster

Posts: 39

October 20, 2008

Once somebody makes a proof of concept that can legalally be used on humans gaming companies will put some major investments into this kind of research. Unless their stupid like the folks who thought that the internet and computers could never catch on, we could easily see this technology within five years.\n\nStill, never underestimate our cumbersome legal system.
Avatar of: subhranshu kumar

subhranshu kumar

Posts: 2

October 23, 2008

I am a victim of poliomyelitis affected my right lower lower limb and 51 years of old.\nDo i expect any triggering of neuron which may repair motor nerve of the limb ?
Avatar of: Jill Josephsen

Jill Josephsen

Posts: 3

July 4, 2009

This is very encouraging!! There is hope afterall.

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
Advertisement
NeuroScientistNews
NeuroScientistNews