The number two-ome

By Elie Dolgin The number two-ome The first two weeks of samples from Lawrence David (L) and Eric Alm (E). Eric Alm bursts into the Massachusetts Institute of Technology lab and grabs a small, maroon-colored sports duffel bag. "Give me seven and a half minutes," he says with a sense of urgency. "I'm taking a sample and I know exactly how long that takes me." Into the duffel bag he stuffs a disposable plastic commode about the

By | July 1, 2009

The number two-ome

The first two weeks of samples from Lawrence David (L) and Eric Alm (E).

Eric Alm bursts into the Massachusetts Institute of Technology lab and grabs a small, maroon-colored sports duffel bag. "Give me seven and a half minutes," he says with a sense of urgency. "I'm taking a sample and I know exactly how long that takes me." Into the duffel bag he stuffs a disposable plastic commode about the size of a fedora hat, latex gloves, an autoclaved sampling tube, and a biohazard container.

"I've been extremely stressed out today," Alm says.

"Have you been taking your blood pressure?" Lawrence David asks eagerly.

"Yeah, it was really high. This should be interesting."

Alm, an evolutionary microbiologist, and David, his graduate student, are engaged in what they're calling the HuGE (Human Gut Ecology) Project—an effort to track how the microbial communities in their own digestive tracts change over time. "The point is to figure out the normal dynamics of what's probably the densest microbial community in the world," explains David.

Bacterial densities in the colon can reach up to 1 trillion cells per milliter of feces. But researchers don't know how this vast microbial ecosystem changes from day to day. In the past, initiatives such as the Human Microbiome Project—a 5-year, $115 million program spearheaded by the National Institutes of Health—have focused on characterizing the gut flora in groups of people, but not on a fine temporal scale.

But to the MIT researchers, the relevant measure of time for the gut is 24 hours. This is the timescale at which bacteria replicate, thus daily sampling is necessary to reveal the system's true dynamics, Alm says. Naturally, "that's a lot of sampling." With his shoestring budget of start-up funds from MIT and the Broad Institute, Alm realized no stranger would volunteer to take part in his proposed study—so he signed himself up. He then polled his graduate students for their levels of interest. "Most of them gave me a strange look, except for Lawrence [David]," Alm recalls. "I said, 'Are you interested in this?' And he said, 'You have no idea how interested I am.'"

"We'll be the first two complete years' worth of feces sequenced."

Since April, Alm and David have been going to the bathroom and taking core samples of their feces, as well as tracking around 100 different metrics of their personal health and daily habits—diet, exercise, mood, sleep patterns, oral hygiene, heart rate, blood pressure, you name it—to see if samples change with daily routines. After the collection phase, scheduled to continue for 6 to 12 months, they ultimately plan to analyze their stool samples using small-subunit (16S) ribosomal RNA gene-sequence–based surveys to characterize their bacterial communities on a day-to-day basis. Alm's postdoc Arne Materna will then have the unenviable task of sequencing the species within the fecal matter. "This is the part I'm still trying not to think about," says Materna. He is using the HuGE project as a test case for a new multiplexed sequencing approach that should allow researchers to probe the microbial diversity of many different samples simultaneously, and with a high degree of accuracy, for a mere $10 a sample. "It will become a game changer," Materna says.

The two researchers are fervently embracing the project. Their wives, however, are less enthusiastic. "My wife has expressly forbidden me from keeping samples in the house," says Alm, who drives to work on the weekends to get his samples promptly into the –80°C freezer. David's wife, however, is more accommodating. "I was eventually able to convince my wife that [storing feces at home] is a reasonable thing to do," he says. "[The samples] live next to the chocolate ice cream. She's not very happy."

But it's all in the name of science, they contend. In January, David wrote a post on his personal blog describing the two of them as the "Watson and Crick of poop." But Alm was quick to correct him. They're the Watson and Venter of poop, he argued, referring to the first two men to have their own entire diploid genomes sequenced. "We'll be the first two complete years' worth of feces sequenced," says Alm. "But right now, it's just a freezer full of shit."

Comments

Avatar of: anonymous poster

anonymous poster

Posts: 13

July 9, 2009

This gives a whole new meaning to the long standing explanation of Ph.D. (Piled Higher and Deeper). I salute them and the wife who agreed to keep it at home!
Avatar of: jim achmoody

jim achmoody

Posts: 1

July 13, 2009

Scatological humor at it's best!

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
Mirus
Mirus
Advertisement
The Scientist
The Scientist