Biolab site choice flawed: report

A government report to be released later this week slams the plan to build a contested high security pathogen lab in Kansas, saying the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) did not properly evaluate the risks of conducting such research in the mainland, the linkurl:Washington Post reports.;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/26/AR2009072602857_pf.html The report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) said the idea of building the National Bio and Agro Defense F

By | July 27, 2009

A government report to be released later this week slams the plan to build a contested high security pathogen lab in Kansas, saying the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) did not properly evaluate the risks of conducting such research in the mainland, the linkurl:Washington Post reports.;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/26/AR2009072602857_pf.html The report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) said the idea of building the National Bio and Agro Defense Facility (NBAF) in Kansas, or in any mainland location, was not "scientifically defensible," according to the Post, and the DHS based its decision on a flawed risk assessment study. Critics have argued that such research should be done on an island to provide an extra measure of protection in case of accidental release, and objected to conducting research on agricultural pathogens in a region of the country crucial for the agricultural industry. Kansas, specifically, is prone to tornadoes, which could damage the facility and further raise the risk of contamination. Last May, the GAO came to a linkurl:similar conclusion;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/54670/ about the prospect of moving research on foot-and-mouth disease from an aging facility on an island in New York to a mainland lab. "We found that [the] DHS has not conducted or commissioned any study" to assess whether FMD can be safely researched on the mainland, Nancy Kingsbury, managing director of applied research and methods at the GAO, said at a hearing then. The NBAF is part of the DHS's plan to modernize the country's biological and agricultural defense research, but has been dogged by controversy from the start. In April, a Texas group (who supported building the facility in Texas) cried foul at the selection process, claiming that aggressive lobbying and political cronyism had caused officials to overlook linkurl:the risk;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55664/ posed to such a lab by tornadoes frequent to Kansas. Kansas officials, however, have insisted that Kansas was selected on its merits in a fair and transparent process. The GAO report will be discussed at a Congressional hearing set for Thursday, July 30. According to the Post, DHS officials last week tried to avert the hearing, and told officials the GAO did not have the authority to review the DHS's risk assessment.
**__Related stories:__***linkurl:Texas to sue over biolab site;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55664/
[24th April 2009]*linkurl:Kansas wins controversial biolab?;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55260/
[4th December 2008]*linkurl:US homeland security to build animal biolab;http://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/23091/
[6th February 2006]

Comments

Avatar of: anonymous poster

anonymous poster

Posts: 8

July 28, 2009

No comments? Would have thought that this case of politics over science would have created............. But then again, I still believe in the germ theory\n

Popular Now

  1. Broad Wins CRISPR Patent Interference Case
    Daily News Broad Wins CRISPR Patent Interference Case

    The USPTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board has ruled in favor of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard retaining intellectual property rights covered by its patents for CRISPR gene-editing technology.

  2. Henrietta Lacks’s Family Seeks Compensation
  3. Cannibalism: Not That Weird
    Reading Frames Cannibalism: Not That Weird

    Eating members of your own species might turn the stomach of the average human, but some animal species make a habit of dining on their own.

  4. Can Plants Learn to Associate Stimuli with Reward?
Business Birmingham