Earlier start to multicellular life?

Newly uncovered fossils hint that multicellular life may have evolved more than 2 billion years ago -- some 200 million years earlier than previously expected, according to a study published this week in Nature. Reconstruction of a specimen from Gabonshowing the peripheral radial fabricand inner structural organizationImage: A. El AlbaniThe fossils are "not really [what] you expect to find in the rock record 2 billion years before present," said paleontologist linkurl:Philip Donoghue;http://ww

By | June 30, 2010

Newly uncovered fossils hint that multicellular life may have evolved more than 2 billion years ago -- some 200 million years earlier than previously expected, according to a study published this week in Nature.
Reconstruction of a specimen from Gabon
showing the peripheral radial fabric
and inner structural organization

Image: A. El Albani
The fossils are "not really [what] you expect to find in the rock record 2 billion years before present," said paleontologist linkurl:Philip Donoghue;http://www.gly.bris.ac.uk/people/pcjd.html of the University of Bristol, who was not involved in the research. "These fossils are centimeters in size" and "relatively thick" -- too large to be just a single cell, he said. The once-biological shapes carved out of black shale formations in Africa outdate the next oldest example of what may have been multicellular life by about 200 million years. Unfortunately, "there's nothing preserved inside," said Donoghue, who wrote an accompanying perspective. "You can't demonstrate [for sure] that it was multicellular [because] you can't see component cells." Sedimentologist Abderrazak El Albani of the linkurl:University of Poitiers;http://www.univ-poitiers.fr/ in France and his colleagues discovered the amorphous fossils in the black shale formations of the Francevillian Basin in Gabon, Africa. The team found more than 250 specimens at the site, all dating to approximately 2.1 billion years ago, and ranging up to 12 centimeters in length. Chemical analyses confirmed the biological origin of the fossils, which are now composed of the iron-sulfide mineral pyrite that replaced the organic tissue as the organism decomposed. And their large and complex structures, as revealed through X-ray microtomography, are indicative of cell-to-cell signaling and coordinated growth between cells, El Albani said. Specifically, the fossils display scalloped edges with radiating slits, and many have a central structure, not unlike the overall structure of a jellyfish medusa. "This organism, in my opinion, was something very light, very gentle, very soft," El Albani speculated. Given the ubiquity of the radial structures among the highly diverse specimens, "I am sure that this radial fabric has some functionality for these specimens," he said, possibly for movement or fixation to the sediment, but "we have a lot of work [to do]" to determine what that function truly was. Still, the complexity and organization of their structure "shows clearly that [these organisms were] multicellular," he insisted. But to call these fossils multicellular, it's important to first define multicellularity, Donoghue told The Scientist. "There are a great number of definitions, some of which are very restrictive and others which are all encompassing." Part of the difficulty in defining the term, he added, is that "much of the molecular machinery that is necessary for cell-to-cell communication is" found even in more primitive organisms, such as bacterial colonies. Interestingly, these fossils appear just a couple million years after the Great Oxidation Event, when oxygen became more widely available in the atmosphere and in the shallow oceans. This may have facilitated the evolution of a thicker organism, where "it becomes more difficult for the cells in the middle to obtain that oxygen if it's only at trace levels in the atmosphere," Donoghue said. Unfortunately, there aren't many other fossils of that age to corroborate the connection. "Most of the rocks of that time have been destroyed," Donoghue said. "There are actually relatively few places in the world where the rocks are reasonably pristine [enough] to find fossils." Indeed, more evidence is needed to demonstrate a more widespread evolution of complex life at that time, El Albani agreed. "I hope that we can correlate [our data] with other basins in the world," he said. "This is only the start of the work." Importantly, even if these fossils are the oldest-known multicellular organisms, that doesn't mean they were the ancestors of all multicellular life, Donoghue said. "Multicellularity hasn't evolved just once; it's evolved almost 20 times even amongst living lineages," he said. "This is probably one of a great number of extinct lineages that experimented with [increased] organismal complexity." A. El Albani, et al., "Large colonial organisms with coordinated growth in oxygenated environments 2.1 Gyr ago," Nature, 466:100-4, 2010.
**__Related stories:__***linkurl:Fossil frenzy;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55725/
[21st May 2009]*linkurl:Earliest fossil seal found;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55653/
[22nd April 2009]*linkurl:Expanding Evolutionary History;http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/53614/
[October 2007]
Advertisement

Comments

Avatar of: Wayne Fagerberg

Wayne Fagerberg

Posts: 2

June 30, 2010

The size of these organisms does not in any way preclude them from being single cells. There are numerous extant examples of single cells meters in size and larger. Many of them have very complex in morphological shape-- e.g. various species of the green alga Caulerpa. Lacking evidence of internal structural compartments it is equally likely that these are unicellular as it is that they are multicellular.
Avatar of: Herb Dreyer

Herb Dreyer

Posts: 5

June 30, 2010

Tracking the origins of multicellular life is always fun but figuring out how the two cells got together asexually is the tough stuff. This because their survival as single cells depended on their staying apart--figure that out?
Avatar of: Joseph Goska

Joseph Goska

Posts: 6

July 1, 2010

Can't see much in the picture, but the first thing that came to my mind when looking at it was fungus growing on a culture plate.
Avatar of: elliott burden

elliott burden

Posts: 1

July 2, 2010

As with other such claims in the past - e.g. Martian life forms in a meteorite, one has to carefully exhaust all of the options.\n\nImages in the Nature article look surprisingly similar to Marcasite rosettes.\n\nMarcasite is an unstable low temperature morph of the common mineral pyrite. Both are commonly found in organic shales.

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
Advertisement
Life Technologies