Advertisement
NeuroScientistNews
NeuroScientistNews

Criminal genes

Experts come together to revisit the controversial field of genetics and criminology.

By | June 22, 2011

MADAMEPSYCHOSIS / FLICKR

How genes influence a person’s risk for committing crimes has always been controversy-laden subject for experts, particularly criminologists and sociologists, who find it hard to disentangle it from notions of discrimination, racism, and eugenics. Yet as the general field of behavioral genetics gains momentum due to the recent explosion of genomic information, researchers are taking a hard, objective look at how inherited traits predispose people to violence and aggression.


This week for example, the National Institute of Justice’s annual conference devoted its opening session to the creation of databases of newly discovered forensic genetic markers, The New York Times reports. Such genetic markers include the serotonin-controlling monoamine oxidase A enzyme (MAO), certain variants of which have been linked to increased impulsivity and aggression. But experts are quick to stress that these genes merely predispose an individual to such behaviors and that additional environmental factors—such as stress, socio-economic background, and even marital status—are usually required for the negative manners to manifest. Therefore, the challenge going forward is not only to produce a list of genetic markers associated with criminal behavior, but to also identify the environmental factors with which they interact.

 

Advertisement

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: Alan In Colorado

Anonymous

June 24, 2011

It might also help if you divide us into our two major groupings.  Most are non-insightful, committing largely spontaneous acts of violence, thievery, and the like.  But many of us sublimate our impulses into actions society approves, e.g. politics, military, police, and even a few in church hierarchies.  

In the second group, instead of aimlessness, I find there's a clarity of thought, unburdened by the machinations so-called moral people have.  

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

June 24, 2011

It might also help if you divide us into our two major groupings.  Most are non-insightful, committing largely spontaneous acts of violence, thievery, and the like.  But many of us sublimate our impulses into actions society approves, e.g. politics, military, police, and even a few in church hierarchies.  

In the second group, instead of aimlessness, I find there's a clarity of thought, unburdened by the machinations so-called moral people have.  

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

June 24, 2011

It might also help if you divide us into our two major groupings.  Most are non-insightful, committing largely spontaneous acts of violence, thievery, and the like.  But many of us sublimate our impulses into actions society approves, e.g. politics, military, police, and even a few in church hierarchies.  

In the second group, instead of aimlessness, I find there's a clarity of thought, unburdened by the machinations so-called moral people have.  

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
Advertisement
Life Technologies