Advertisement

Medical Device Researchers Slanted Trials

Researchers with financial ties to a company that makes a popular back surgery product overlooked the product’s adverse side effects.

By | July 1, 2011

Spinal fusion X-rayKRAWIEC VIA FLICKR

In a series of papers appearing this week in Spine, several experts publicly chastised other researchers for publishing misleading and biased trials on a spinal fusion product called Infuse, which surgeons can use to fuse vertebrae in the back to eliminate pain. During 13 clinical trials of Infuse that tested a total of 780 patients in the late 1990s and early 2000s,more than 20 researchers failed to report adverse side effects, and played up the advantages of Infuse over the traditional bone graft. According to the Spine papers, the researchers had received $60 to $70 million from Medtronic, Inc., the product’s maker, and many of the researchers did not disclose their financial agreements, The Chronicle reports.

Though Infuse had already been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2002 for use in elderly patients whose hip bone cannot be harvested for a bone graft, the trials by researchers on Medtronic’s payroll touted the benefits of using it in a much wider population, and it is now used in a quarter of all spinal fusions, Time reports. Now, researchers are arguing the product shouldn’t be used except in a narrow patient population, pointing to studies performed by unaffiliated scientists that documented side effects including inflammation, male sterility, and unwanted bone growth.

Advertisement
Keystone Symposia
Keystone Symposia

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: Bizecologyd

Anonymous

July 1, 2011

Why does this stupid disqus crap cover the story I want to read?

Avatar of: rob

Anonymous

July 1, 2011

^ because you don't use Firefox with Adblock.

Avatar of: Bizecology

Anonymous

July 1, 2011

I was accessing it from a tablet computer.  Apparently this site doesn't respond to that type of computer.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

July 1, 2011

Why does this stupid disqus crap cover the story I want to read?

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

July 1, 2011

^ because you don't use Firefox with Adblock.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

July 1, 2011

I was accessing it from a tablet computer.  Apparently this site doesn't respond to that type of computer.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

July 1, 2011

Why does this stupid disqus crap cover the story I want to read?

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

July 1, 2011

^ because you don't use Firefox with Adblock.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

July 1, 2011

I was accessing it from a tablet computer.  Apparently this site doesn't respond to that type of computer.

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
The Scientist
The Scientist
Advertisement
The Scientist
The Scientist