Advertisement
NeuroScientistNews
NeuroScientistNews

Gene Patents Upheld

A US federal appeals court says human genes are patentable.

By | July 29, 2011

FLICKR, BRIAN TURNER

Myriad Genetics, a Utah-based molecular diagnostic company, can keep its patents the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, mutations in which are associated with most inherited forms of breast and ovarian cancers.

The company patented the genes in 2000 and 2001, after developing a genetic test based on them. But in May 2009, Myriad was sued by the American Civil Liberties Union, which claimed that patenting human genes was unconstitutional, as it could inhibit medical practice and research efforts.

In March 2010, a New York federal court ruled that the patents were invalid. Today (July 29), a US federal appeals court overturned that decision, arguing that the company has the right to patent both genes because it is testing for specific mutated forms of the genes that have a different molecular structure than the naturally occurring genes, Reuters reports.

“The fact that genes will [be] considered patentable subject matter is a good decision,” patent attorney Lisa Haile, co-chair of law firm DLA Piper’s Global Life Sciences Sector, said in a statement, as preventing such patents may discourage industry partners from undertaking such projects.

The ACLU, on the other hand, says that the ruling is a step backwards for science. “Today’s ruling is a blow to the idea that patent law cannot impede the free flow of ideas in scientific research,” Chris Hansen, a staff attorney with the ACLU Speech, Privacy and Technology Project, said in a statement. “Human DNA is not a manufactured invention, but a natural entity like air or water. To claim ownership of genetic information is to unnecessarily block the free exchange of ideas.”

Advertisement

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: Sitaramamv

Anonymous

August 1, 2011

This gives insight into the apparent conflict between religion and science only in the US to sidetrack people from market dominance. This is also the only place most vociferously advocating patenting the genomes. The trick is in diverting the attention from the main  issues to issues which are non sequitur.Creation or evolution...has been going on for some time and we were expecting a sequel to Dawkins' 'God Illusion' entitled 'Dawkin Illusion' by God! Regardless of the particular religion, any religion or even common ethics would have imposed the ruling that if the native genes are made by the good Lord, there is no evidence that the He also has not made the mutants or that these came from Lucifer. The argument would have called for return to the Planet of Apes where we would all have been marketable mutants.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

August 1, 2011

This gives insight into the apparent conflict between religion and science only in the US to sidetrack people from market dominance. This is also the only place most vociferously advocating patenting the genomes. The trick is in diverting the attention from the main  issues to issues which are non sequitur.Creation or evolution...has been going on for some time and we were expecting a sequel to Dawkins' 'God Illusion' entitled 'Dawkin Illusion' by God! Regardless of the particular religion, any religion or even common ethics would have imposed the ruling that if the native genes are made by the good Lord, there is no evidence that the He also has not made the mutants or that these came from Lucifer. The argument would have called for return to the Planet of Apes where we would all have been marketable mutants.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

August 1, 2011

This gives insight into the apparent conflict between religion and science only in the US to sidetrack people from market dominance. This is also the only place most vociferously advocating patenting the genomes. The trick is in diverting the attention from the main  issues to issues which are non sequitur.Creation or evolution...has been going on for some time and we were expecting a sequel to Dawkins' 'God Illusion' entitled 'Dawkin Illusion' by God! Regardless of the particular religion, any religion or even common ethics would have imposed the ruling that if the native genes are made by the good Lord, there is no evidence that the He also has not made the mutants or that these came from Lucifer. The argument would have called for return to the Planet of Apes where we would all have been marketable mutants.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

August 16, 2011

Does this mean Co.'s can sue people that have that Co. patented genes?  Taking the consequences of some decision to the extreme can be enlighting and is used in many Supreme Court decisions.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

August 16, 2011

Does this mean Co.'s can sue people that have that Co. patented genes?  Taking the consequences of some decision to the extreme can be enlighting and is used in many Supreme Court decisions.

Avatar of: Nilspace

Anonymous

August 16, 2011

Does this mean Co.'s can sue people that have that Co. patented genes?  Taking the consequences of some decision to the extreme can be enlighting and is used in many Supreme Court decisions.

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
Advertisement
Life Technologies