More Questions about Polar Bear Researcher

An investigation into a polar bear scientist’s suspension raises more questions than it answers.

By | August 12, 2011

Polar BearFLICKR, LONGHORNDAVE

The mystery surrounding the investigation into Charles Monnett, the wildlife biologist who was suspended for undisclosed reasons, has deepened, ScienceInsider reports.

Initial media reports claimed the biologist had been suspended by his employer, the US Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement (BOEMRE), and was being investigated because of a 2006 paper which tied an increase in Arctic polar bear deaths to climate change.

And though the director of BOEMRE, Michael Bromwich, had previously claimed the investigation has nothing to do with Monnett’s scientific work, auditor questions in a three-hour interview yesterday largely focused on the peer-review process behind the acceptance of the article.

In response to the investigation, James Inhofe, a Republican Senator from Oklahoma and the ranking member on the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, sent a letter to  BOEMRE. The 2006 paper laid the foundation for establishing the polar bear as a threatened species, he wrote, so accusations could have far-reaching consequences. He’s also asking BOEMRE to explain the reasons for its inquiry. “We don't know where this investigation came from," he told ScienceInsider. "But the bigger mystery is why they think anything needs to be investigated.”

BOEMRE has previously stated that they were investigating how Monnett managed a polar bear research project.

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: Default_user

Default_user

Posts: 1457

August 13, 2011

Tia Ghose's .... blurb .... is just a lurid title without foundation that leads to an article with zero content.  In contrast to what she states, in the article she cites it states: "But a spokesperson for the Center of Biological Diversity's Climate Law Institute, one of the agencies that supported the polar bear's listing, says that Monnett's paper was only one of hundreds cited."  Responsible scientific journalism is not about propagating innuendo; it's about getting to the facts and data and reporting them in a way the public can understand.  Miss Ghose is a discredit to scientists and journalists everywhere.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

August 13, 2011

Tia Ghose's .... blurb .... is just a lurid title without foundation that leads to an article with zero content.  In contrast to what she states, in the article she cites it states: "But a spokesperson for the Center of Biological Diversity's Climate Law Institute, one of the agencies that supported the polar bear's listing, says that Monnett's paper was only one of hundreds cited."  Responsible scientific journalism is not about propagating innuendo; it's about getting to the facts and data and reporting them in a way the public can understand.  Miss Ghose is a discredit to scientists and journalists everywhere.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

August 13, 2011

Tia Ghose's .... blurb .... is just a lurid title without foundation that leads to an article with zero content.  In contrast to what she states, in the article she cites it states: "But a spokesperson for the Center of Biological Diversity's Climate Law Institute, one of the agencies that supported the polar bear's listing, says that Monnett's paper was only one of hundreds cited."  Responsible scientific journalism is not about propagating innuendo; it's about getting to the facts and data and reporting them in a way the public can understand.  Miss Ghose is a discredit to scientists and journalists everywhere.

Popular Now

  1. How Plants Evolved Different Ways to Make Caffeine
  2. Thomson Reuters Predicts Nobelists
    The Nutshell Thomson Reuters Predicts Nobelists

    According to citation statistics, researchers behind programmed cell death pathways and CRISPR/Cas9 are among those in line for Nobel Prizes this year.

  3. Sequencing Reveals Genomic Diversity of the Human Brain
  4. Reviewing Results-Free Manuscripts
    The Nutshell Reviewing Results-Free Manuscripts

    An open-access journal is trialing a peer-review process in which reviewers do not have access to the results or discussion sections of submitted papers.

RayBiotech