Advertisement
NeuroScientistNews
NeuroScientistNews

Fewer PhD Funds for UK

UK’s Research Councils may fund fewer new doctoral students in the upcoming academic year.

By | August 16, 2011

WIKIMEDIA COMMONS, CHRIS MONCUS

The United Kingdom's Engineering and Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC) may fund as many as 1,000 fewer PhDs this year, ScienceInsider reports—reducing the 2,902 new doctoral students it funded in the 2010-11 academic year to just 1,900. While this news represents a "worst-case scenario," a more conservative estimate would still entail a 20 percent drop in funded PhDs over the next 5 years, Atti Emecz, EPSRC's director for communications, information and strategy, told ScienceInsider. The Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, another of the UK’s seven Research Councils, is also likely to see a reduction in funding for PhDs.

One reason for the drop  is the EPSRC's decision to stop funding students by allowing them to be included in research project proposals. This had become an increasingly popular way to fund PhD students in the United Kingdom, but it drew from the same pot of money that supported postdocs, and "we saw a risk that we would be funding students at the expense of postdoctoral research assistants,” Emecz said. “That seems counterproductive to us."

Additionally, the research council is shifting towards the funding of centers for doctoral training (CDTs) that provide 4-year, rather than 3-year, PhDs, as a way of emphasizing quality over quantity. But longer programs are more expensive, and thus limit the number of students the EPSRC can fund.

Lesley Cohen, director of postgraduate studies for physics at Imperial College London, worries that this may not be the best move right now. "They are twice as expensive," she told ScienceInsider. Furthermore, the drop in funding will likely affect the UK’s ability to recruit students from around Europe, she said, as there are now restrictions regarding the percentage of the funding that can go towards non-UK students. "It's educating British students for science in Britain rather than educating the best young brains in Europe," Cohen said.

Advertisement

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: Trnsplnt

Anonymous

August 17, 2011

I'm disappointed that there's no mention of any calculation of whether or not those 2,902 new PhDs would be able to find jobs.  Could that be one reason to reduce the slots?

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

August 17, 2011

I'm disappointed that there's no mention of any calculation of whether or not those 2,902 new PhDs would be able to find jobs.  Could that be one reason to reduce the slots?

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

August 17, 2011

I'm disappointed that there's no mention of any calculation of whether or not those 2,902 new PhDs would be able to find jobs.  Could that be one reason to reduce the slots?

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
Advertisement
Life Technologies