Advertisement

The Happiness of English

There are more positive words than negative ones in the written English language.

By | August 31, 2011

WIKIMEDIA COMMONS, CHRISTOPH MICHELS

Across books, songs, even news publications and social media sites, positives words are used more commonly than negative ones, according to a new study published Monday (August 29) on arXiv, an online prepublication site widely used in the physical sciences.

Hypotheses regarding the reasons language evolved as it did are varied, including purely practical explanations such as coordinating social behaviors, like hunting, and more cultural explanations, like the support of altruism and cooperation. The answer, some anthropologists believe, may be found in the language itself.

In one of the most comprehensive analyses of the English language to date, mathematicians from Cornell University and the University of Vermont collated more than 10,000 words from four sources of text—Google Books, Twitter, The New York Times, and song lyrics. The words were scored on a scale of 1 to 9, with 1 being the most negative and 9 being the most positive. (The highest score was awarded to "laughter," which received an 8.5, while “terrorist” received the lowest, coming it at 1.3, according to Wired Science.)

Overall, the researchers found that positive words outnumbered negative ones, suggesting “a positivity bias” in the language, the authors wrote. “In our stories and writings we tend toward pro-social communication.” They added that future work is needed to determine the “positivity” of other languages and dialects, as well as the trends towards other emotions. Comparing the results could reveal interesting correlations between language characteristics and aspects of societal organization in different cultures around the world.

 

Advertisement
Keystone Symposia
Keystone Symposia

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: Guest

Anonymous

August 31, 2011

And then Scientist wonder why people laugh at them and hate that their tax dollars directly or indirectly fund such stupid crap at Universities. Then these same graduates expect to land jobs doing more useless research.

Avatar of: Diogenes

Anonymous

August 31, 2011

BadBadBob, at the risk of putting too many negative words into a sentence, you're a know-nothing ignoramus who doesn't have a clue what constitutes worthwhile research.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

August 31, 2011

And then Scientist wonder why people laugh at them and hate that their tax dollars directly or indirectly fund such stupid crap at Universities. Then these same graduates expect to land jobs doing more useless research.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

August 31, 2011

BadBadBob, at the risk of putting too many negative words into a sentence, you're a know-nothing ignoramus who doesn't have a clue what constitutes worthwhile research.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

August 31, 2011

And then Scientist wonder why people laugh at them and hate that their tax dollars directly or indirectly fund such stupid crap at Universities. Then these same graduates expect to land jobs doing more useless research.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

August 31, 2011

BadBadBob, at the risk of putting too many negative words into a sentence, you're a know-nothing ignoramus who doesn't have a clue what constitutes worthwhile research.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

September 2, 2011

Whatever happened to "If you can't say something good, don't say anything at all." ?? Information is information that is useful. We just don't know when it will be useful. Some people think that food stamps stifle competitiveness and job searching. Food banks were born on lack of empathy. It may be that we could learn something that no one had thought.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

September 2, 2011

Whatever happened to "If you can't say something good, don't say anything at all." ?? Information is information that is useful. We just don't know when it will be useful. Some people think that food stamps stifle competitiveness and job searching. Food banks were born on lack of empathy. It may be that we could learn something that no one had thought.

Avatar of: GoodGoodBob

Anonymous

September 2, 2011

Whatever happened to "If you can't say something good, don't say anything at all." ?? Information is information that is useful. We just don't know when it will be useful. Some people think that food stamps stifle competitiveness and job searching. Food banks were born on lack of empathy. It may be that we could learn something that no one had thought.

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
Advertisement
The Scientist
The Scientist