Top 7 in Ecology

A snapshot of the most highly ranked articles in ecology, from Faculty of 1000

By | September 8, 2011

Temperate broadleaf and mixed forest in GermanyWIKIMEDIA, OLIVER HEROLD

1. Dialing back extinction rates

A widely-used, indirect method of estimating how quickly species will vanish based on how much of their habitat is lost likely overestimates actual extinction rates. Calculating the loss of species based on habitat shrinkage usually misjudges extinction rates because the area required to remove the last individual of a species is almost always much larger than the area needed to encounter the first individual.

F. He and S.P. Hubbell, "Species-area relationships always overestimate extinction rates from habitat loss," Nature, 473:368-71, 2011. Free F1000 Evaluation

2. Energy flux in water and on land

Increasing the flow of energy through ecosystems makes them less stable by increasing the ratio of consumers to resources available. And it turns out that watery ecosystems are more vulnerable to this instability than terrestrial systems as populations of small-bodied, aquatic organisms experience greater population variability when energy flux increases.

J.M. Rip and K.S. McCann, "Cross-ecosystem differences in stability and the principle of energy flux," Ecol Lett, 14:733-40, 2011. Free F1000 Evaluation

3. Warming climate shifts ranges

The habitat ranges of birds, mammals, fish, plants, and arthropods are shifting to higher latitudes and altitudes at rates two to three times faster than previously estimated due to warming temperatures.

I.C. Chen, et al., "Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming," Science, 333:1024-6, 2011. Free F1000 Evaluation

4. Specialists within generalist populations

Generalist populations often harbor individuals that are more specialized, especially in the diet they consume, than their neighbors. How many individuals diverge from their population's typical diet depends on the level of intra and interspecific competition, ecological opportunity, and predation.

M.S. Araújo, et al., "The ecological causes of individual specialisation," Ecol Lett, 14:948-58, 2011. Free F1000 Evaluation

5. Asexual ants have sex

The fungus-growing ant species, Mycocepurus smithii, was long thought to be exclusively asexual, as only parthenogenetic populations had been collected from widely separated areas. But researchers have found that sexually-reproducing populations cluster along the Rio Amazonas and the Rio Negro in South America.

C. Rabeling, et al., "From the Cover: Cryptic sexual populations account for genetic diversity and ecological success in a widely distributed, asexual fungus-growing ant," Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 108:12366-71, 2011. Free F1000 Evaluation

6. What makes systems stable?

This 35-year-old paper is still the standard proof that well-developed, well-connected, and species-rich community structures lead to more stable ecosystems.

R.E. McMurtrie, "Determinants of stability of large randomly connected systems," J Theor Biol, 50:1-11, 1975. Free F1000 Evaluation

7. Tallying Earth's species

Using an algorithm that calculates species numbers based on patterns of the higher taxonomic classification of species to phyla, classes, orders, etc., researchers estimate that more than 8.5 million eukaryotic species, more than 2 million of which are marine organisms, exist on planet Earth. If the estimation is correct, this would mean that about 86 percent of terrestrial species and 91 percent of ocean-dwelling organisms await discovery and description.

C. Mora, et al., "How many species are there on earth and in the ocean?" PLoS Biology, 9:e1001127, 2011. Free F1000 Evaluation

The F1000 Top 7 is a snapshot of the highest ranked articles from a 30-day period on Faculty of 1000 Ecology, as calculated on September 1, 2011. Faculty Members evaluate and rate the most important papers in their field. To see the latest rankings, search the database, and read daily evaluations, visit http://f1000.com.

Advertisement

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: Curculio

Anonymous

September 8, 2011

Hu and Hu bbell make an elementary logical mistake in their
title.  As the saying goes, one should 'never' use the word 'always'
because there may be an unforeseeable or forgotten instance where one's
argument fails. The point of failure here is when the area of available livable territory is zero.  Here, all models should give the same result of some extinction rate that forces the number of viable species to 0.  While the standard extinction models may produce higher extinction rates than can seen within our current time frame, one should remember that God placed all of nature's species on an X cubit by Y cubit boat for 40 days and nights.  God didn't expect them to live there permanently.  I can only hope that Hu and Hubbell think likewise; that just because there is a minimum amount of space for some period of time, one can't expect long-term survivorship to follow.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

September 8, 2011

Hu and Hu bbell make an elementary logical mistake in their
title.  As the saying goes, one should 'never' use the word 'always'
because there may be an unforeseeable or forgotten instance where one's
argument fails. The point of failure here is when the area of available livable territory is zero.  Here, all models should give the same result of some extinction rate that forces the number of viable species to 0.  While the standard extinction models may produce higher extinction rates than can seen within our current time frame, one should remember that God placed all of nature's species on an X cubit by Y cubit boat for 40 days and nights.  God didn't expect them to live there permanently.  I can only hope that Hu and Hubbell think likewise; that just because there is a minimum amount of space for some period of time, one can't expect long-term survivorship to follow.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

September 8, 2011

Hu and Hu bbell make an elementary logical mistake in their
title.  As the saying goes, one should 'never' use the word 'always'
because there may be an unforeseeable or forgotten instance where one's
argument fails. The point of failure here is when the area of available livable territory is zero.  Here, all models should give the same result of some extinction rate that forces the number of viable species to 0.  While the standard extinction models may produce higher extinction rates than can seen within our current time frame, one should remember that God placed all of nature's species on an X cubit by Y cubit boat for 40 days and nights.  God didn't expect them to live there permanently.  I can only hope that Hu and Hubbell think likewise; that just because there is a minimum amount of space for some period of time, one can't expect long-term survivorship to follow.

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
BioCision
BioCision
Advertisement
PITTCON
PITTCON
Life Technologies