Advertisement

Ancient Jelly Simplifies Animal Tree?

A newly discovered fossil of a nearly 600-million-year-old comb jelly ancestor may call for scientists to rethink early animal evolution.

By | September 9, 2011

Two modern comb jelliesWIKIMEDIA COMMONS, STEVE JURVETSON

A 580-million-year-old fossil suggests that evolution of bilateral symmetry may be simpler than previously thought, Nature reports. The fossil, an eight-armed swirl named Eoandromeda after the galaxy Andromeda, is believed by researchers to be the ancestor of modern comb jellies, which populate oceans worldwide and swim using rows of cilia, or combs. On the established tree of animal evolution, comb jellies branch off after the cnidarians, other jelly-filled creatures like sea anemones and jellyfish.

Like vertebrates, cnidarians exhibit bilateral or biradial symmetry—meaning they can be bisected into two mirror images. The ancestors of comb jellies, however, were not. The current version of the animal tree, which has the comb jelly lineage arising after bilateral cnidarians but before bilateral flatworms suggests that bilateral symmetry must have evolved twice—once in the cnidarian lineage, and again in animals that evolved after the comb jellies branched away. The new fossil, however, may shake up that view. According to the paper published recently in Evolution and Development, the new fossils of Eoandromeda would place comb jellies lower down on the tree than  cnidarians, meaning bilateral symmetry would only have evolved once in the animal lineage—after comb jellies evolved.

"Eoandromeda puts a little piece of weight in favour of a more basal position for comb jellies," co-author Stefan Bengtson, a palaeontologist at the Swedish Museum of Natural History, told Nature. The new theory is also supported by emerging DNA evidence that suggests comb jellies emerged earlier than previously thought.

Advertisement

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: Tiznado

Anonymous

September 9, 2011

An interesting finding about this A. sediba, it seems to me that there was more than one human species living simultaneously during our evolution and some of them just dissapear, but Carl Sagan said onc: mother nature is trying very hard to make us survive an succeed but if that turns out not to be the case, it does not matter because we are not the only experiment running...

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

September 9, 2011

An interesting finding about this A. sediba, it seems to me that there was more than one human species living simultaneously during our evolution and some of them just dissapear, but Carl Sagan said onc: mother nature is trying very hard to make us survive an succeed but if that turns out not to be the case, it does not matter because we are not the only experiment running...

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

September 9, 2011

An interesting finding about this A. sediba, it seems to me that there was more than one human species living simultaneously during our evolution and some of them just dissapear, but Carl Sagan said onc: mother nature is trying very hard to make us survive an succeed but if that turns out not to be the case, it does not matter because we are not the only experiment running...

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
Rainin Instrument
Rainin Instrument
Advertisement
Life Technologies