Libel Case Against Nature Starts

A theoretical physicist is suing the journal for an article it ran about his publication practices.

By | November 14, 2011

WIKIMEDIA COMMONS, AVJOSKA

Opening arguments in the libel trial against the venerated scientific journal Nature got under way last week in London's High Court. Egyptian physicist Mohamed El Naschie is suing the publication for running a 2008 news story that he claims damaged his reputation. The article alleged that El Naschie self-published numerous papers in the Elsevier-owned theoretical physics journal Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, where he served as editor-in-chief for 17 years. The Nature story, which is "temporarily unavailable" on the journal's website, also claimed that El Naschie listed several honorary professorships and other affiliations that journalist Quirin Schiermeier could not confirm.

According to BBC News, the lawyer representing Nature in the case said in his opening statement that he would argue the validity of the article, which represented what he called "true, honest opinion and responsible journalism on an issue of public interest." El Naschie is representing himself in the case. The blog site El Naschie Watch, which is highly critical of the physicist, has predicted that the High Court is likely to rule in favor of Nature within a month.

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: jhnycmltly

jhnycmltly

Posts: 65

November 14, 2011

I suppose one can therefore EXPECT to be censured by Nature for "inappropriate" medical theories ? If Nature is NOW being sued for libel then my experience of being censured may not be as uncommon as I might like to think.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

November 14, 2011

I suppose one can therefore EXPECT to be censured by Nature for "inappropriate" medical theories ? If Nature is NOW being sued for libel then my experience of being censured may not be as uncommon as I might like to think.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

November 14, 2011

I suppose one can therefore EXPECT to be censured by Nature for "inappropriate" medical theories ? If Nature is NOW being sued for libel then my experience of being censured may not be as uncommon as I might like to think.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

November 15, 2011

Thanks for informative post. I am pleased sure this post has helped me save many hours of browsing other similar posts just to find what I was looking for.
Industrial Surplus

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

November 15, 2011

Thanks for informative post. I am pleased sure this post has helped me save many hours of browsing other similar posts just to find what I was looking for.
Industrial Surplus

Avatar of: kinjal shah

kinjal shah

Posts: 2

November 15, 2011

Thanks for informative post. I am pleased sure this post has helped me save many hours of browsing other similar posts just to find what I was looking for.
Industrial Surplus

Popular Now

  1. Top 10 Innovations 2016
    Features Top 10 Innovations 2016

    This year’s list of winners celebrates both large leaps and small (but important) steps in life science technology.

  2. Gut Microbes Linked to Neurodegenerative Disease
  3. Pubic Hair Grooming Linked to STI Risk
    The Nutshell Pubic Hair Grooming Linked to STI Risk

    Observational study suggests pubic hair grooming correlates with heightened risk of acquiring sexually transmitted infections, although causation remains unclear.

  4. Naive T Cells Find Homes in Lymphoid Tissue
Rockland