Libel Case Against Nature Starts

A theoretical physicist is suing the journal for an article it ran about his publication practices.

By | November 14, 2011

WIKIMEDIA COMMONS, AVJOSKA

Opening arguments in the libel trial against the venerated scientific journal Nature got under way last week in London's High Court. Egyptian physicist Mohamed El Naschie is suing the publication for running a 2008 news story that he claims damaged his reputation. The article alleged that El Naschie self-published numerous papers in the Elsevier-owned theoretical physics journal Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, where he served as editor-in-chief for 17 years. The Nature story, which is "temporarily unavailable" on the journal's website, also claimed that El Naschie listed several honorary professorships and other affiliations that journalist Quirin Schiermeier could not confirm.

According to BBC News, the lawyer representing Nature in the case said in his opening statement that he would argue the validity of the article, which represented what he called "true, honest opinion and responsible journalism on an issue of public interest." El Naschie is representing himself in the case. The blog site El Naschie Watch, which is highly critical of the physicist, has predicted that the High Court is likely to rule in favor of Nature within a month.

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: jhnycmltly

jhnycmltly

Posts: 65

November 14, 2011

I suppose one can therefore EXPECT to be censured by Nature for "inappropriate" medical theories ? If Nature is NOW being sued for libel then my experience of being censured may not be as uncommon as I might like to think.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

November 14, 2011

I suppose one can therefore EXPECT to be censured by Nature for "inappropriate" medical theories ? If Nature is NOW being sued for libel then my experience of being censured may not be as uncommon as I might like to think.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

November 14, 2011

I suppose one can therefore EXPECT to be censured by Nature for "inappropriate" medical theories ? If Nature is NOW being sued for libel then my experience of being censured may not be as uncommon as I might like to think.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

November 15, 2011

Thanks for informative post. I am pleased sure this post has helped me save many hours of browsing other similar posts just to find what I was looking for.
Industrial Surplus

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

November 15, 2011

Thanks for informative post. I am pleased sure this post has helped me save many hours of browsing other similar posts just to find what I was looking for.
Industrial Surplus

Avatar of: kinjal shah

kinjal shah

Posts: 2

November 15, 2011

Thanks for informative post. I am pleased sure this post has helped me save many hours of browsing other similar posts just to find what I was looking for.
Industrial Surplus

Popular Now

  1. How Plants Evolved Different Ways to Make Caffeine
  2. Thomson Reuters Predicts Nobelists
    The Nutshell Thomson Reuters Predicts Nobelists

    According to citation statistics, researchers behind programmed cell death pathways and CRISPR/Cas9 are among those in line for Nobel Prizes this year.

  3. Sequencing Reveals Genomic Diversity of the Human Brain
  4. Reviewing Results-Free Manuscripts
    The Nutshell Reviewing Results-Free Manuscripts

    An open-access journal is trialing a peer-review process in which reviewers do not have access to the results or discussion sections of submitted papers.

RayBiotech