Advertisement
Bethyl Laboratories
Bethyl Laboratories

Life Sciences Salary Survey 2011

US salaries are starting to recover after last year’s survey recorded the first-ever drop.

By | December 1, 2011

Last year the recession hit paychecks as well as jobs, with overall salaries in the life sciences showing the first decrease over a previous year since The Scientist began the survey in 2001. But this year things are moving back up, with a $6,000 increase in median salaries over 2010, bringing total earnings (salaries plus fees, bonuses, and profit sharing) almost back to the 2009 median of $90,000. Thus, despite the starker grant-funding reality for scientists the world over, salaries, at least, are starting to recover.

Indeed, the moderate increase in salaries is seen across many disciplines in this year’s data. The highest salaries are found in areas under the most pressure to improve the public’s safety and standard of living. This translates to a focus on specialties such as virology and immunology (infectious disease and autoimmune disorders), genomics (personalized medicine), developmental biology (stem cell research for regenerating damaged organs and tissues), and cancer research.

As the funding landscape continues to change, with higher salaries and more job offers coming from industry than ever before, researchers looking to earn more will have to think hard about how their skills fit with the demands of the times. Many more scientists may find themselves considering a shift to industry and government positions, which offer higher pay.

According to the National Science Foundation’s 2010 Science and Engineering Indicators, the public dollars allotted to research and development have not increased since 2004. However, 60 percent of all R&D expenditures go toward life science research, and the rate of job growth in that sector continues to be higher than that of the overall workforce (as of 2007, the most recent year the data were collected).

Academic Specialties

Salaries in the life sciences vary widely across disciplines, and generally reflect the level of interest and investment in a particular field. This year’s big winners include biophysics, virology, cancer/oncology, genomics, neuroscience, developmental biology, and immunology. These fields largely encompass those a­reas of research valued by the aging baby-boomer population, says Alan Edwards, a product leader for Kelly Scientific Resources.

“Neuroscience translates to [the idea that] we are looking for clarity of mind,” he says. Cancer/oncology, genomics, and immunology also hit on ailments that affect aging populations, as researchers attempt to identify biomarkers for early disease detection and effective treatments. And in biophysics, he adds, researchers are looking for ways to help the elderly maintain mobility and independence in their lives. “The three things that everybody’s looking for as they age are their health and well-­being, mobility, and clarity of mind,” Edwards says. “That fits with where the research dollars are going and where there’s the highest earning potential.”

Academic Jobs

Job Title Female (1,000 $US) Male (1,000 $US)
College/University Department Head 119 170
Professor 135 150
Associate Professor 98 98
Assistant Professor 75 85
College Instructor 57 57
Adjunct Professor 60 89
Post-Doctoral Researcher 42 43
Graduate Student 26 27
Research Associate 51 58
Laboratory Manager 47 54
Laboratory Technician/ Research Assistant 40 40
Other Academic Position 68 70
Showing 1 to 12 of 12 entries

 

Experience vs. Level of Responsibility

The 2011 Salary Survey data reflect the not-unexpected correlation of higher compensation with increasing experience and increasing amount of responsibility. “There is a high degree of reward for continuing to be present in the workforce,” Edwards says. This has encouraged many aging scientists to postpone retirement in order to make up for money lost during the series of economic recessions starting in the late 1990s. During those periods, Edwards says, a lot of 401(k)s dropped in value. “Then we also had real-estate values drop—the bottom just fell out,” he adds. “The retirable equity has diminished considerably, meaning people have to work more years to maintain the lifestyle that they have.”

That said, people are also motivated by a desire to remain productive, Edwards says. “Money isn’t the No. 1 thing. It’s the degree to which they can give back and provide some importance in the world.”

Industry Jobs
 

Years of Experience Female (1,000 $US) Male (1,000 $US)
Under one year 55 96
One or two years 67 87
Three or four years 65 93
Five to nine years 90 101
10 to 14 years 93 121
15 to 19 years 119 120
20 to 24 years 132 134
25 to 29 years 110 163
30 to 34 years 110 175
35 to 39 years - 149
40 to 44 years - 145
Showing 1 to 11 of 11 entries

 

Jobs by Region and Employer Type

Minnesota, with high industry salaries for the Midwest, is known for its development of medical devices—an industry that is growing thanks to the increased emphasis on the aging population, and in particular, on mobility research. “You’ve got implantable devices—knee implants, joint implants—to give people their mobility,” Edwards says.

Also evident in these data is a trend The Scientist sees year after year: variation in salaries between academic institutions, nonacademic research organizations, and industry. “Clearly, it’s more rewarding from a financial perspective to be in industry than it is to be in academia,” Edwards says. While this has long been true, the trend may be even more exaggerated now, as “that is where the jobs are—in industry, not academia.” It’s also where more and more of the money is coming from, according to Patrick C­lemins, Director of the R&D Budget and Policy Program at the American Association for the Advancement of Science: more than 65 percent of US R&D funding came from industry in 2008, compared to just 50 percent in 1988. (See “A Quarter Century of Fueling Science,” The Scientist, October 2011.)

The US hot spots for biotech and pharma are the San Francisco Bay area, Boston, San Diego, New York/New Jersey/Pennsylvania (also known as the tri-state area or the Pharmaceutical Corridor), and the Raleigh/Durham/Chapel Hill Research Triangle, Edwards says. And salaries reflect both the higher competition for researchers in those areas and the generally higher cost of living.

Specialization Academia 
(1,000 $US)
Non-academic 
(1,000 $US)
Industry 
(1,000 $US)
Biochemistry 85 96 125
Bioinformatics 68 105 131
Biotechnology 98 104 110
Cancer/Oncology 80 75 107
Cell Biology 65 75 106
Chemistry - General/Other 78 90 78
Clinical Research 120 86 163
Drug Discovery/ Development/ Delivery 101 144 139
Environmental Science 67 89 48
Genetics 85 90 130
Showing 1 to 10 of 23 entries

 

Education Level and Gender

One clear trend in this year’s data is the persistence of the gender gap—in the life sciences men still make, on average, more than women in comparable positions. But Edwards notes that the difference is smaller than it once was, and he expects it to continue to compress. “The gap is closing,” he says. Before long, “the skill reward, as opposed to the gender reward, is going to be dominant.”

One notable figure on this chart is the exceptionally low salaries of women with MD/PhD degrees. But Edwards suspects this is simply “an aberration,” most likely a result of the small sample size in this category. What’s more important to take from these data is the value of all levels of education. “In the workforce, you’re going to need PhDs and you’re going to need lab techs,” Edwards says. And from a business perspective, companies may often value the lower levels of education more. “The quality of the education is higher, and therefore we’re producing more skilled graduates. You will get more output for [a given] education level than you would have in the past,” adds Edwards.

Nonacademic Jobs

Job Activity Female (1,000 $US) Male (1,000 $US)
Administration (primarily not of research) 97 137
Analytical Services 64 85
Clinical Services 98 104
Government (excluding Health/Safety and Regulatory) 97 110
Health and Safety/Regulatory Affairs 101 111
Research - Administration 110 155
Research - Clinical 58 138
Research - Field 85 105
Research - Laboratory 60 85
Showing 1 to 9 of 9 entries

 

 

Advertisement
The Scientist
The Scientist

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: snowfly912

snowfly912

Posts: 2

December 8, 2011

It looks that the salary of postdoc is not so bad in U.S, but why the postdoc's salary is so low in Kansas area? I know someone just get ~$32000 in KUMC.

Avatar of: snowfly912

snowfly912

Posts: 2

December 8, 2011

It looks that the salary of postdoc is not so bad in USA, but why it's so low in Kansas(~32k)?

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

December 8, 2011

It looks that the salary of postdoc is not so bad in USA, but why it's so low in Kansas(~32k)?

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

December 8, 2011

It looks that the salary of postdoc is not so bad in U.S, but why the postdoc's salary is so low in Kansas area? I know someone just get ~$32000 in KUMC.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

December 8, 2011

It looks that the salary of postdoc is not so bad in U.S, but why the postdoc's salary is so low in Kansas area? I know someone just get ~$32000 in KUMC.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

December 8, 2011

It looks that the salary of postdoc is not so bad in USA, but why it's so low in Kansas(~32k)?

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

December 29, 2011

Because many institutions do not require PIs to pay NIH minimum (~38K) and since the cost of living in Kansas is significantly less than say Boston or NYC they'll try and justify it that way...

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

December 29, 2011

In our counry 
(Belarus)  the salary of postdoc is about 2000$ per year. But it needs to be noted that the living cost is olso small. I deal with the electronic sciences.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

December 29, 2011

In our counry 
(Belarus)  the salary of postdoc is about 2000$ per year. But it needs to be noted that the living cost is olso small. I deal with the electronic sciences.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

December 29, 2011

Because many institutions do not require PIs to pay NIH minimum (~38K) and since the cost of living in Kansas is significantly less than say Boston or NYC they'll try and justify it that way...

Avatar of: Mike S

Mike S

Posts: 1457

December 29, 2011

Because many institutions do not require PIs to pay NIH minimum (~38K) and since the cost of living in Kansas is significantly less than say Boston or NYC they'll try and justify it that way...

Avatar of: Saa88

Saa88

Posts: 1

December 29, 2011

In our counry 
(Belarus)  the salary of postdoc is about 2000$ per year. But it needs to be noted that the living cost is olso small. I deal with the electronic sciences.

Avatar of: bordeanu

bordeanu

Posts: 2

January 4, 2012

The salary difference between male and female for the same job has something to say on how well the job is done by a male or a female, or about sex discrimination???

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

January 4, 2012

The salary difference between male and female for the same job has something to say on how well the job is done by a male or a female, or about sex discrimination???

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

January 4, 2012

The salary difference between male and female for the same job has something to say on how well the job is done by a male or a female, or about sex discrimination???

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

February 10, 2012

It actually usually has to do with the fact that more males remain in senior positions for longer, whether it be for family reasons, etc...It also shows kind of the opposite effect, it seems females are hired to higher positions sooner and thus are at the low end of each category for each position as they are not remaining as long

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

February 10, 2012

It actually usually has to do with the fact that more males remain in senior positions for longer, whether it be for family reasons, etc...It also shows kind of the opposite effect, it seems females are hired to higher positions sooner and thus are at the low end of each category for each position as they are not remaining as long

Avatar of: Todd

Todd

Posts: 1457

February 10, 2012

It actually usually has to do with the fact that more males remain in senior positions for longer, whether it be for family reasons, etc...It also shows kind of the opposite effect, it seems females are hired to higher positions sooner and thus are at the low end of each category for each position as they are not remaining as long

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
Mettler Toledo
Mettler Toledo
Advertisement
The Scientist
The Scientist
Life Technologies