Advertisement
The Scientist
The Scientist

Skin Cells Cause Cancer?

Certain skin-residing immune cells may—under specific conditions—play a direct role in initiating skin cancer after exposure to environmental toxins.

By | January 6, 2012

image: Skin Cells Cause Cancer? ImageJ=1.45h unit=um Langerhans cells (green) have internalized the chemical mutagen DMBA (blue) into seemingly vesicular collections. Julia Lewis, Laboratory of Dr. Michael Girardi, Yale University

Langerhans cells (green) have internalized the chemical mutagen DMBA (blue) into seemingly vesicular collections. JULIA LEWIS, LABORATORY OF DR. MICHAEL GIRARDI, YALE UNIVERSITY

Langerhans cells, the main immune cell type found in the epidermis of the skin, facilitate carcinogenesis in neighboring epithelial cells by helping to metabolize toxins into even more mutagenic forms in mice, according to a study published today (Jan 5) in Science.

The study “shows a function for Langerhans cells that is outside of immune function,” said Stuart Yuspa, a senior investigator at the National Cancer Institute who researches carcinogenesis and epithelial differentiation but was not involved in the current research. This novel metabolic function turns out to be instrumental in the carcinogenesis of surrounding skin cells.

Discovered in 1868, Langerhans cells are primarily thought to behave as sentinels, initiating and regulating adaptive immune responses by processing and presenting antigens to T cells. However, there is still a lot of controversy surrounding how Langerhans cells regulate immunity.

Dermatologist and cancer immunologist Michael Girardi of the Yale School of Medicine has been particularly interested in investigating the role of Langerhans cells in carcinogenesis, as the cells have been shown to be capable of presenting tumor antigens to T cells.

Girardi and his colleagues employed a widely used, two-step skin cancer model that consists of dousing the skin of genetically susceptible mice with a potent carcinogen, the polyaromatic hydrocarbon 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA). The mice are then repeatedly exposed to a compound that induces chronic proliferation and inflammation of epithelial cells, eventually resulting in the development of squamous cell carcinoma, a common skin cancer involving cells in the upper part of the epidermis. Around 90 percent of the cancerous cells in this model display a signature point mutation in codon 61 of the Hras gene—a mutation that activates the oncogenic potential of the gene and has been implicated in a variety of cancers.

But when the researchers carried out the procedure in mice with no Langerhans cells, they were surprised to see that the mice didn’t develop cancer. “It had the opposite effect of what we had hypothesized,” Girardi said. “Mice that were lacking Langerhans cells were almost completely resistant to carcinogenesis.”

In fact, the keratinocytes—the predominant cell type in the epidermis—of mice lacking Langerhans cells displayed little general DNA damage as well as significantly fewer Hras codon 61 mutations 24 hours after DMBA treatment compared with normal mice. Similarly, the researchers observed that the metabolites isolated from DMBA-treated human Langerhans cells were capable of causing extensive DNA damage in cultured human keratinocytes. These results suggest that the Langerhans cells were involved in an early, key step of keratinocyte mutagenesis.

The researchers suspected Langerhans cells might be involved in metabolizing DMBA, which “has a complex metabolism that is required for it to become the ultimate mutagen,” Yuspa explained. The “ultimate” mutagenic form of DMBA—DMBA-3,4-diol-1,2-epoxide (or DMBADE)—displays a strong affinity for, and thus causes point mutations in, codon 61 (CAA) of Hras in keratinocytes and is achieved after multiple steps by several enzymes expressed by both Langerhans cells and keratinocytes.

However, the two cell types express different ratios of the enzymes, with Langerhans cells preferentially expressing an enzyme that catalyzes the reduction of DMBA into the mutagenic precursor of DMBADE, and keratinocytes preferentially expressing an enzyme that converts that precursor into DMBADE.

While DMBA is not found in the environment, many other polyaromatic hydrocarbons are prevalent in industrial pollutants, and at least 30 percent of human squamous cell carcinomas have activating Hras mutations. Thus, it may be possible that a similar mechanism may be occurring in a subset of human skin cancers that are caused by exposure to carcinogenic pollutants.

“This raises questions about what other functions Langerhans cells may have,” Yuspa said.

"B.G. Modi, et. al., "Langerhans Cells Facilitate Epithelial DNA Damage and Squamous Cell Carcinoma," Science

Advertisement

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: paulissa

paulissa

Posts: 1

January 6, 2012

Visit This Site
Guillain Barre Syndrome

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

January 6, 2012

Visit This Site
Guillain Barre Syndrome

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

January 6, 2012

Visit This Site
Guillain Barre Syndrome

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

January 17, 2012

Disappointing to see the misuse of the word 'toxin'.  The term 'toxin' applies strictly to poisons synthesized by living organisms. While DMBA is certainly a poison and a carcinogen, it is NOT a toxin.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

January 17, 2012

Disappointing to see the misuse of the word 'toxin'.  The term 'toxin' applies strictly to poisons synthesized by living organisms. While DMBA is certainly a poison and a carcinogen, it is NOT a toxin.

Avatar of: Rosalind Dalefield

Rosalind Dalefield

Posts: 1457

January 17, 2012

Disappointing to see the misuse of the word 'toxin'.  The term 'toxin' applies strictly to poisons synthesized by living organisms. While DMBA is certainly a poison and a carcinogen, it is NOT a toxin.

Avatar of: TheSciAdmin

TheSciAdmin

Posts: 56

January 18, 2012

Hi Rosalind,

  Thank you for bringing the incorrect use of the word toxin to my attention. I apologize for the error.

Best,
Cristina Luiggi

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

January 18, 2012

Hi Rosalind,

  Thank you for bringing the incorrect use of the word toxin to my attention. I apologize for the error.

Best,
Cristina Luiggi

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

January 18, 2012

Hi Rosalind,

  Thank you for bringing the incorrect use of the word toxin to my attention. I apologize for the error.

Best,
Cristina Luiggi

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

January 19, 2012

Thank you Very much for explaining all this to
people. It is a great help! A big thank you for this post and to your website
at all.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

January 19, 2012

Thank you Very much for explaining all this to
people. It is a great help! A big thank you for this post and to your website
at all.

Avatar of: BerryChad

BerryChad

Posts: 1

January 19, 2012

Thank you Very much for explaining all this to
people. It is a great help! A big thank you for this post and to your website
at all.

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement
The Scientist
The Scientist

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
The Scientist
The Scientist
Advertisement
NeuroScientistNews
NeuroScientistNews
Life Technologies