Advertisement

Saliva Legit for HIV Testing

A quick spit test is as good as blood for detecting HIV, and could encourage self-testing initiatives in the US and Africa.

By | January 25, 2012

image: Saliva Legit for HIV Testing OraQuick HIV test

OraQuick HIV test

A pain-free, non-invasive saliva test is as accurate as a traditional blood test to diagnose infections of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), according to a new meta-analysis published yesterday (January 24) in The Lancet Infectious Diseases. The test could be a solution for countries that wish to adopt self-testing strategies for HIV.

Pooling data from five worldwide databases, an international team of researchers found that Oraquick HIV-1/2, a saliva test sold by Pennsylvania-based OraSure Technologies, is 99 percent accurate for HIV in high-risk populations and about 97 percent accurate in low-risk populations. The test requires a single swab of the gums, which is then inserted into a handheld device that produces results in 20 minutes. The Oraquick has been available to clinicians since 2004 and is being considered for use as an over-the-counter test in the United States and sub-Saharan countries, the paper noted.

“Getting people to show up for HIV testing at public clinics has been difficult because of visibility, stigma, lack of privacy, and discrimination. A confidential testing option such as self-testing could bring an end to the stigmatization associated with HIV testing,” Nitika Pant Pai, a researcher at McGill University in Montreal, Canada, who led the study, said in a press release. “There is a huge global momentum for alternate HIV self-testing strategies that can inform people know of their status.”

Though the non-invasive test is attractive, it still has a “substantial” false-positive rate in low-risk populations, noted Chi Chiu Leung of the Department of Health in Hong Kong and Shui Shan Lee of the Chinese University of Hong Kong, in an accompanying comment in the Lancet. “This factor must be considered for test interpretation,” they wrote.

Advertisement

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: PolishBear

PolishBear

Posts: 1

January 25, 2012

I am an HIV Prevention Specialist for the West Virginia Bureau for Public Health. I have personally been doing HIV testing and counseling for the past 10 years, the past 4 of which I have used the OraQuick device almost exclusively. My own experience with OraQuick has been great. I have had no "false positives" so far. Although "false negatives" can occur if a patient has not waited long enough after any possibility of being infected to get tested, that is not the fault of the test device. It is up to me, as a counselor, to ask the right questions during pre-test counseling, so that I can determine whether my patient has waited long enough to get an accurate test result.

I know that eventually the OraQuick test will become available over the counter. My biggest reservation with that is that persons who conduct their own HIV testing at home will not get the counseling they need when they get their test results.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

January 25, 2012

I am an HIV Prevention Specialist for the West Virginia Bureau for Public Health. I have personally been doing HIV testing and counseling for the past 10 years, the past 4 of which I have used the OraQuick device almost exclusively. My own experience with OraQuick has been great. I have had no "false positives" so far. Although "false negatives" can occur if a patient has not waited long enough after any possibility of being infected to get tested, that is not the fault of the test device. It is up to me, as a counselor, to ask the right questions during pre-test counseling, so that I can determine whether my patient has waited long enough to get an accurate test result.

I know that eventually the OraQuick test will become available over the counter. My biggest reservation with that is that persons who conduct their own HIV testing at home will not get the counseling they need when they get their test results.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

January 25, 2012

I am an HIV Prevention Specialist for the West Virginia Bureau for Public Health. I have personally been doing HIV testing and counseling for the past 10 years, the past 4 of which I have used the OraQuick device almost exclusively. My own experience with OraQuick has been great. I have had no "false positives" so far. Although "false negatives" can occur if a patient has not waited long enough after any possibility of being infected to get tested, that is not the fault of the test device. It is up to me, as a counselor, to ask the right questions during pre-test counseling, so that I can determine whether my patient has waited long enough to get an accurate test result.

I know that eventually the OraQuick test will become available over the counter. My biggest reservation with that is that persons who conduct their own HIV testing at home will not get the counseling they need when they get their test results.

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
NuAire Inc.
NuAire Inc.
Advertisement
NeuroScientistNews
NeuroScientistNews