Coffee Pest Gene Transfer

An insect that plagues coffee plants likely got its bean-digesting gene from a bacterium.

By | February 27, 2012

Coffee plants abandoned in Colombia becasue of the coffee berry borer beetle, known as broca.FLICKR, NEIL PALMER

Horizontal or lateral gene transfers—the swap of genetic material between different species—are relatively rare in animals and, when they are identified, they frequently have unknown ecological significance. Research published online today (February 27) in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences shows that a coffee-devouring insect pest has a bacterial gene embedded in its DNA that encodes a coffee-digesting protein.

“What’s novel in this case is a bacterial gene going into the insect that actually allows the insect to feed off of a new food source,” said Julie Dunning Hotopp, a genomicist who studies lateral gene transfer at the University of Maryland and was not involved in the research. “It’s a gene that’s been transferred and it’s functional.”

Coffee berry borer beetle (Hypothenemus hampei) is an insect pest that feeds on coffee beans, causing industry losses of around $500 million each year and affecting more than 17 million coffee-farming families. A few years ago, a group of researchers at Cenicafé, Colombia’s National Center for Coffee Research, contacted Jocelyn Rose, a plant biologist at Cornell University, to study what proteins are secreted by the pest that allow it to digest coffee.

Screening the insect’s gut for digestive enzymes, Rose identified a protein similar to mannanase, an enzyme found across kingdoms that can break down coffee-specific sugars. But “there are no mannanase genes in insects,” Rose said. “What was remarkable is that, when we looked at the gene sequence, it looked like a bacterial sequence.”

Despite its sequence similarity to bacterial genes, the gene did show some hallmarks of eukaryotes, such as the addition of a poly-A tail on the resulting RNA and the loss of the Shine-Delgarno sequence, a prokaryotic-specific sequence found upstream of the gene. The researchers confirmed that the gene was not present due to gut bacteria contamination by carefully sequencing the regions on either side of the gene. The flanking areas were eukaryotic transposons, pieces of DNA that can jump around the genome, not bacterial sequences, indicating the sequence wasn’t from a bacterium living in the gut.

If the gene did indeed come from a bacterium, it would mark one of only a few cases of lateral gene transfer in animals.

Rose and his team also sequenced this same region of the genome in coffee berry borers collected from 16 countries, and found that the gene was present in all of them, suggesting that the gene acquisition preceded its invasion as a pest. He then harvested the enzyme from the beetle’s gut to show that it could, in fact, break down coffee beans. In contrast, the gut enzymes and proteins from closely related beetle species could not digest the coffee, suggesting they did not carry the mannanase or related genes.

But how the borer beetles acquired the gene is unclear. The presence of flanking transposons could be one explanation, Rose noted. However, “a lot of DNA is composed of transposons, so [a gene is] more likely to be [inserted] adjacent to a transposon” just by chance, Dunning Hotopp said. Plus, gene insertion into transposon-heavy DNA regions is less likely to “disrupt a gene needed by the organism,” she added, preventing its quick elimination by natural selection.

Regardless of the mechanism, the evidence for both lateral gene transfer and ecological significance are compelling, said Patrick Keeling, a molecular evolutionary biologist at the University of British Columbia who did not participate in the study. However, “the distribution of an enzyme like this is critical to understanding any ecological implications.” Because few insect genomes are sequenced, scientists simply don’t know how widespread the enzyme is. If as more insect genomes are sequenced, the gene starts “popping up all over the place, this could get more complicated, maybe in a really interesting way,” he added.

R. Acuña et al., “Adaptive horizontal transfer of a bacterial gene to an invasive insect pest of coffee,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1121190109, 2012.

Advertisement

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: Namby Ravi Reddiar

Namby Ravi Reddiar

Posts: 1457

February 29, 2012

My friends coffee plantation in HAWAII.Adhering to advantage gene mutation and rejecting the reduntant.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

February 29, 2012

My friends coffee plantation in HAWAII.Adhering to advantage gene mutation and rejecting the reduntant.

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
Advertisement
Life Technologies