Advertisement

Long Live the Y

Despite suggestions to the contrary, the Y chromosome is not necessarily rotting away.

By | February 22, 2012

About 300 million years ago, early mammalian X and Y chromosomes were identical. But in the intervening time, the Y chromosome lost hundreds of genes, decaying into a shell of its former self. This has led some scientists to propose the “rotting Y” theory, which suggests that the human Y chromosome will continue to decay until it totally disappears in about 5 to 10 million years. New research, however, suggests that the Y chromosome has a long, healthy life ahead of it and is in no danger of disappearing.

The study, reported this week in Nature, compared the newly sequenced Y of the rhesus monkey to human and chimpanzee Y chromosomes, and found that the primate Y has been remarkably genetically stable for the past 25 million years.

“This and other evidence suggest that some of these genes are important and have been retained in primate lineages,” said Mark Jobling, who studies the sex chromosome at the University of Leicester in the United Kingdom and was not involved in the research. The Y chromosome does not appear to be decaying away, he said.

But not everyone agrees. “I don’t think this means we can relax about the human Y chromosome,” said Jennifer Graves of La Trobe University in Melbourne, Australia, who was also not involved in the study. Graves has been an outspoken advocate of the rotting Y theory, and, in a 2006 review of the subject, predicted that the Y chromosome will decay in an uneven, jerky process. The new data support that prediction, she argued. “One can’t predict [the degradation of the Y], because it’s a very stochastic process,” she said.

Roughly 300 million years ago, during early mammalian evolution, a segment of the X chromosome stopped crossing over with the Y, causing rapid genetic decay on the Y. This occurred another 4 times throughout the history of mammals, and each time the Y chromosome experienced gene loss. The events were so extensive that today the human Y retains only 3 percent of the more than 600 genes it once shared with the X chromosome.

Prior to the present study, only the human and chimpanzee Y chromosomes had been sequenced, though numerous organisms, from fish to insects to plants, have independently evolved Y chromosomes. Jennifer Hughes, David Page, and colleagues at the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Science in Cambridge, Massachusetts, sequenced the Y of the rhesus monkey and compared it to the other two sequences. Chimpanzees diverged from humans only 6 million years ago, but rhesus monkeys diverged 25 million years ago, so the new information provides a look at how the primate Y chromosome has changed over a much longer period of time. Genetically speaking, it hasn’t changed much.

The rhesus monkey hasn’t lost a single ancestral gene on its Y chromosome in the past 25 million years, and the human Y has lost just one gene in that period. The Y chromosome’s evolution, therefore, is marked by periods of swift decay followed by strict conservation, said Hughes. And that should put the “rotting Y” theory to rest, she added. “We finally have this very strong empirical evidence that there’s been essentially no change in gene content for 25 million years,” she said. “I’m pretty sure it’s going to be hard to argue with that.”

Yet the study also revealed that the rhesus Y does not have large sections of repeated DNA sequences, called palindromes, that the human and chimpanzee Y chromosomes both have, Graves pointed out. “This means human and chimp lineages must have quite recently gone berserk and made lots of copies,” she said. “To me, that amplification is the last gasp of the Y chromosome.” Two Japanese rice rat species, for example, recently lost their Y chromosomes, and a third has a Y that is now making lots of palindromes. That Y chromosome has “gone bananas,” said Graves, signaling that it will soon disappear as it did in the other two species.

Whether the Y continues to degrade or not, the fact that a core set of genes has stuck around, despite major loss events, suggests that these genes were selected for by natural selection. “The genes that are still on the human Y chromosome have been around for a long time, and that suggests they must actually be doing something useful,” said Jobling. Unfortunately, scientists don’t know what that is. “The Y chromosome has been neglected,” he said. Beyond sex determination, “we really have very little idea” what most of the genes on the chromosome do.

“But we’d love to know,” added Hughes, who plans to follow up the research with functional studies of the conserved genes. The team also plans to sequence Y chromosomes from other animals, including the rat, mouse, and opossum. “They have interesting positions in the mammalian tree and are model organisms,” Hughes said.

J.F. Hughes et al., “Strict evolutionary conservation followed rapid gene loss on human and rhesus Y chromosome,” Nature, doi:10.1038/nature10843, 2012.

 

Advertisement

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: Dov

Dov

Posts: 1457

February 23, 2012

Rash Human Y Demising?On The Male Sex Chromosome (posted July 25 2009)
A. On Human male sex chromosome, aaagain?From "Male Sex Chromosome Losing Genes By Rapid Evolution, Study Reveals"http://www.sciencedaily.com/re..."...we also know that most of the genes were not important for survival because they were lost, which led to the very different numbers of genes we observe between the once-identical X and Y. Although there is evidence that the Y chromosome is still degrading, some of the surviving genes on the Y chromosome may be essential, which can be inferred because these genes have been maintained for so long."
"...found evidence that some others are on track to disappear, as well."

B. From "Spontaneous speciation?"http://www.the-scientist.com/b... from "On The Origin And Tasks Of Brain Cells"http://www.the-scientist.com/c... from "Conservation of Y-linked genes during human evolution revealed by comparative sequencing in chimpanzee"http://www.nature.com/nature/j...
Chimp's genome has been continuing survival by physiologically adapting to changing environments, whereas Human's genome continued survival mainly by modifying-controlling its environment.

C. AcademEnglish verbiage should be at least scientifically carefulThe rate of "losing genes" by an organism is not a constant value of a natural law. It is induced and set mostly by the rate and nature of the change of culture of the organism, which is induced, in turn , by various circumstantial factors...
IMO we can feel assured that the human Y is not on an accelerating course to oblivion... Dov Henis (Comments from 22nd century)  

Avatar of: Dov

Dov

Posts: 1457

February 23, 2012

Rash Human Y Demising?On The Male Sex Chromosome (posted July 25 2009)
A. On Human male sex chromosome, aaagain?From "Male Sex Chromosome Losing Genes By Rapid Evolution, Study Reveals"http://www.sciencedaily.com/re...

"...we also know that most of the genes were not important for survival because they were lost, which led to the very different numbers of genes we observe between the once-identical X and Y. Although there is evidence that the Y chromosome is still degrading, some of the surviving genes on the Y chromosome may be essential, which can be inferred because these genes have been maintained for so long."
"...found evidence that some others are on track to disappear, as well."

B. From "Spontaneous speciation?"http://www.the-scientist.com/b...

And from "On The Origin And Tasks Of Brain Cells"http://www.the-scientist.com/c...

And from "Conservation of Y-linked genes during human evolution revealed by comparative sequencing in chimpanzee"http://www.nature.com/nature/j... genome has been continuing survival by physiologically adapting to changing environments, whereas Human's genome continued survival mainly by modifying-controlling its environment.

C. AcademEnglish verbiage should be at least scientifically careful
The rate of "losing genes" by an organism is not a constant value of a natural law. It is induced and set mostly by the rate and nature of the change of culture of the organism, which is induced, in turn , by various circumstantial factors...
IMO we can feel assured that the human Y is not on an accelerating course to oblivion... Dov Henis (Comments from 22nd century)
 
(Improve earlier posting...)

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

February 23, 2012

Rash Human Y Demising?On The Male Sex Chromosome (posted July 25 2009)
A. On Human male sex chromosome, aaagain?From "Male Sex Chromosome Losing Genes By Rapid Evolution, Study Reveals"http://www.sciencedaily.com/re..."...we also know that most of the genes were not important for survival because they were lost, which led to the very different numbers of genes we observe between the once-identical X and Y. Although there is evidence that the Y chromosome is still degrading, some of the surviving genes on the Y chromosome may be essential, which can be inferred because these genes have been maintained for so long."
"...found evidence that some others are on track to disappear, as well."

B. From "Spontaneous speciation?"http://www.the-scientist.com/b... from "On The Origin And Tasks Of Brain Cells"http://www.the-scientist.com/c... from "Conservation of Y-linked genes during human evolution revealed by comparative sequencing in chimpanzee"http://www.nature.com/nature/j...
Chimp's genome has been continuing survival by physiologically adapting to changing environments, whereas Human's genome continued survival mainly by modifying-controlling its environment.

C. AcademEnglish verbiage should be at least scientifically carefulThe rate of "losing genes" by an organism is not a constant value of a natural law. It is induced and set mostly by the rate and nature of the change of culture of the organism, which is induced, in turn , by various circumstantial factors...
IMO we can feel assured that the human Y is not on an accelerating course to oblivion... Dov Henis (Comments from 22nd century)  

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

February 23, 2012

Rash Human Y Demising?On The Male Sex Chromosome (posted July 25 2009)
A. On Human male sex chromosome, aaagain?From "Male Sex Chromosome Losing Genes By Rapid Evolution, Study Reveals"http://www.sciencedaily.com/re...

"...we also know that most of the genes were not important for survival because they were lost, which led to the very different numbers of genes we observe between the once-identical X and Y. Although there is evidence that the Y chromosome is still degrading, some of the surviving genes on the Y chromosome may be essential, which can be inferred because these genes have been maintained for so long."
"...found evidence that some others are on track to disappear, as well."

B. From "Spontaneous speciation?"http://www.the-scientist.com/b...

And from "On The Origin And Tasks Of Brain Cells"http://www.the-scientist.com/c...

And from "Conservation of Y-linked genes during human evolution revealed by comparative sequencing in chimpanzee"http://www.nature.com/nature/j... genome has been continuing survival by physiologically adapting to changing environments, whereas Human's genome continued survival mainly by modifying-controlling its environment.

C. AcademEnglish verbiage should be at least scientifically careful
The rate of "losing genes" by an organism is not a constant value of a natural law. It is induced and set mostly by the rate and nature of the change of culture of the organism, which is induced, in turn , by various circumstantial factors...
IMO we can feel assured that the human Y is not on an accelerating course to oblivion... Dov Henis (Comments from 22nd century)
 
(Improve earlier posting...)

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

February 24, 2012

Visit This Site
Wholesale Salt Soap

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

February 24, 2012

Rash Human Y Demising?
On The Male Sex Chromosome (posted July 25 2009)
A. On Human male sex chromosome, again?From "Male Sex Chromosome Losing Genes By Rapid Evolution, Study Reveals"http://www.sciencedaily.com/re...  "...we also know that most of the genes were not important for survival because they were lost, which led to the very different numbers of genes we observe between the once-identical X and Y. Although there is evidence that the Y chromosome is still degrading, some of the surviving genes on the Y chromosome may be essential, which can be inferred because these genes have been maintained for so long."
"...found evidence that some others are on track to disappear, as well."

B. "Spontaneous speciation?"http://www.the-scientist.com/b... "Conservation of Y-linked genes during human evolution revealed by comparative sequencing in chimpanzee"http://www.mombu.com/science/e...
Chimp's genome has been continuing survival by physiologically adapting to changing environments, whereas Human's genome continued survival mainly by modifying-controlling its environment.

C. AcademEnglish verbiage should be at least scientifically careful
The rate of "losing genes" by an organism is not a constant value of a natural law. It is induced and set mostly by the rate and nature of the change of culture of the organism, which is induced, in turn , by various circumstantial factors...
IMO we can feel assured that the human Y is not on an accelerating course to oblivion... Dov Henis (Comments from 22nd century) http://universe-life.com/2012/... 

Avatar of: brendonhurley

brendonhurley

Posts: 2

February 24, 2012

Visit This Site
Wholesale Salt Soap

Avatar of: Dov

Dov

Posts: 1457

February 24, 2012

Rash Human Y Demising?
On The Male Sex Chromosome (posted July 25 2009)
A. On Human male sex chromosome, again?From "Male Sex Chromosome Losing Genes By Rapid Evolution, Study Reveals"http://www.sciencedaily.com/re...  "...we also know that most of the genes were not important for survival because they were lost, which led to the very different numbers of genes we observe between the once-identical X and Y. Although there is evidence that the Y chromosome is still degrading, some of the surviving genes on the Y chromosome may be essential, which can be inferred because these genes have been maintained for so long."
"...found evidence that some others are on track to disappear, as well."

B. "Spontaneous speciation?"http://www.the-scientist.com/b... "Conservation of Y-linked genes during human evolution revealed by comparative sequencing in chimpanzee"http://www.mombu.com/science/e...
Chimp's genome has been continuing survival by physiologically adapting to changing environments, whereas Human's genome continued survival mainly by modifying-controlling its environment.

C. AcademEnglish verbiage should be at least scientifically careful
The rate of "losing genes" by an organism is not a constant value of a natural law. It is induced and set mostly by the rate and nature of the change of culture of the organism, which is induced, in turn , by various circumstantial factors...
IMO we can feel assured that the human Y is not on an accelerating course to oblivion... Dov Henis (Comments from 22nd century) http://universe-life.com/2012/... 

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
UVP
UVP
Advertisement