Neuroscientist Guilty of Misconduct

Michael Miller is found guilty of research misconduct, having misconstrued data in four NIH grants, two papers, and one manuscript.

By | February 28, 2012

FLICKR, BRIAN TURNER

The Office of Research Integrity has found neuroscientist Michael Miller guilty of research misconduct. Formerly of the State University of New York Upstate Medical Center, Miller altered figures and data in four National Institutes of Health grants, two already retracted papers, and one submitted manuscript. All efforts appear to exaggerate the effects of alcohol on fetal development.

While Miller “neither admits nor denies committing research misconduct,” he has agreed voluntarily to exclude himself from contract work for a federal agency for a year, and will have his work supervised for two years. However, he’s no longer employed by SUNY Upstate and, according to the Retraction Watch blog, his whereabouts are unknowns.

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: mochamutt

mochamutt

Posts: 2

February 28, 2012

misconstrued means to misinterpret or to make a mistake in understanding--it does not mean falsify...

Avatar of: Hannah Waters

Hannah Waters

Posts: 10

February 28, 2012

Thank you for identifying the vocabulary mishap. The story's dek has been updated accordingly.

-Hannah

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

February 28, 2012

misconstrued means to misinterpret or to make a mistake in understanding--it does not mean falsify...

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

February 28, 2012

Thank you for identifying the vocabulary mishap. The story's dek has been updated accordingly.

-Hannah

Popular Now

  1. Consilience, Episode 3: Cancer, Obscured
  2. RNAi’s Future in Drug-Target Screening
    News Analysis RNAi’s Future in Drug-Target Screening

    A recent CRISPR study contradicted years of RNA interference research on a well-studied cancer drug target. But is it the last nail in the coffin for RNAi as a screening tool? 

  3. A History of Screening for Natural Products to Fight Cancer
  4. Streakers, Poopers, and Performers: The Wilder Side of Wildlife Cameras
AAAS