Advertisement

More Scrutiny for Senior Scientists?

The NIH plans an extra layer of review for scientists with at least $1.5 million in existing grants.

By | March 30, 2012

image: More Scrutiny for Senior Scientists? Flickr, JMR Photography

FLICKR, JMR PHOTOGRAPHY

In its 2013 budget request, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) outlined an additional round of review for any researchers with $1.5 million or more in existing grant money, in an effort to support the work of less-experienced scientists. But the proposal faced criticism when the budget request came before a Senate Appropriations subcommittee, reported The Chronicle of Higher Education. Senator Richard C. Shelby of Alabama, the subcommittee's top Republican, worried that the plan would “discourages success,” and argued that grant funding decisions should be made purely on scientific merit.

NIH director Francis Collins responded that only some 6 percent of NIH grant applicants would qualify for the extra level of review, and that the new regulation would be unlikely to result in denials of grant proposals that would otherwise be funded. “It is just that if an investigator has already achieved that amount of funding, and comes in asking for more, that particular grant is going to get a little bit more scrutiny,” he told the subcommittee.

And despite Shelby’s insistence on impartiality when it comes to funding scientific research, he did encourage Collins to include his home state of Alabama in its Institutional Development Award program, which dedicates funds for research taking place at universities in states with historically low NIH grant success rates. To this, the subcommittee's chairman, Senator Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), reminded Shelby of his earlier comments about distributing funds strictly on scientific merit. “We're not in the business of just spreading money around,” Harkin said.

Advertisement

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: YouKnowBestOfAll

YouKnowBestOfAll

Posts: 16

April 1, 2012

The Tax Payer has every right to demand more scrutiny when, in times of budget deficits and severe austerity measures, her/his tax-payers money is spent.

The Academia should NOT be a welfare program and the recipients of public grants should be even more accountable to the public, demonstrating clearly WHAT the benefit for the public from the money spent is.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

April 1, 2012

The Tax Payer has every right to demand more scrutiny when, in times of budget deficits and severe austerity measures, her/his tax-payers money is spent.

The Academia should NOT be a welfare program and the recipients of public grants should be even more accountable to the public, demonstrating clearly WHAT the benefit for the public from the money spent is.

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
Advertisement
Life Technologies