US Doesn’t Ban BPA

The FDA announces that BPA will continue to be permitted in food and beverage containers.

By | April 2, 2012

Benutzer Bodoklecksel" > Wikimedia Commons, Benutzer Bodoklecksel

WIKIMEDIA COMMONS, BENUTZER BODOKLECKSEL

In 2010, Canada added Bisphenol A (BPA), a chemical that has been linked to heart disease, certain cancers, and other health problems, to its list of toxic substances, and Canada, the European Union and 11 US states have banned the chemical in baby bottles. But BPA will not yet be banned from US canned products, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced on Friday (March 30).

Research suggests that BPA causes a variety of human health effects by mimicking estrogen, and thus affecting aspects of development and normal physiological functioning. Industry groups, however, argue that the studies are not powered with appropriate controls and sample sizes, and that solid evidence linking BPA to these illnesses was lacking. But Campbell’s Soup, at least, announced it would be phasing out BPA from its products.

The current FDA decision was prompted by a lawsuit filed last August by the environmental group National Resources Defense Council. It is not a “final safety determination,” the agency stated, adding that it plans to continue “to support research examining the safety of BPA,” a Nature blog reported.

While the decision is expected to meet some opposition, “my opinion is that it is prudent,” Scott Belcher, an endocrine-disruptor expert at the University of Cincinnati in Ohio, told Nature. “There are still a lot of data coming out.”

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: jgarcia543

jgarcia543

Posts: 6

April 3, 2012

If they banned BPA, wouldn't they effectively need to ban 95% of plastics??
 (http://www.npr.org/2011/03/02/...

Avatar of: jgarcia543

jgarcia543

Posts: 6

April 3, 2012

If they banned BPA, wouldn't they be forced to ban 95% of plastics??

(http://www.npr.org/2011/03/02/...

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

April 3, 2012

If they banned BPA, wouldn't they effectively need to ban 95% of plastics??
 (http://www.npr.org/2011/03/02/...

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

April 3, 2012

If they banned BPA, wouldn't they be forced to ban 95% of plastics??

(http://www.npr.org/2011/03/02/...

Popular Now

  1. Henrietta Lacks’s Family Seeks Compensation
  2. Broad Wins CRISPR Patent Interference Case
    Daily News Broad Wins CRISPR Patent Interference Case

    The USPTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board has ruled in favor of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard retaining intellectual property rights covered by its patents for CRISPR gene-editing technology.

  3. Humans Never Stopped Evolving
    Features Humans Never Stopped Evolving

    The emergence of blood abnormalities, an adult ability to digest milk, and changes in our physical appearance point to the continued evolution of the human race.

  4. Abundant Sequence Errors in Public Databases
Business Birmingham