Advertisement

Academics Win Patent Rights

A judge says that government and university labs have to share the patent rights to the successful cancer drug Velcade.

By | April 10, 2012

FLICKR, BRIAN TURNER

Two University of Kansas researchers should have been included as co-inventors on two patents for the blood cancer drug Velcade, a three-member arbitration panel decided last week. The patents for the drug—which generated $623 million in sales last year, Bloomberg Businessweek reportedare owned by the National Institutes of Health and licensed to the drug’s manufacturer, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, now part of Japanese drugmaker Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., but the Kansas researchers who also worked on the drug filed a lawsuit in 2008 arguing that they should have been included as well.

The panel decided that the drug was the result of a collaboration between Kansas researchers Valentino Stella and Wanda Waugh and National Cancer Institute researcher Shanker Gupta, so it is unfair that only Gupta is listed on the patents. Specifically, Stella and Waugh helped develop acceptable dosages for Velcade, and conduct safety and effectiveness experiments on the drug. The case highlights the common challenge of determining who gets credit for technologies developed by both academic and government researchers.

“The university could have ownership rights to the intellectual property,” William Atkins of the Pillsbury law firm, which represented the university, told Bloomberg. “When there is a university involved and a government employee claims co- inventorship, the law is not always clear who owns the property.”

(Hat tip to The Chronicle of Higher Education.)

Advertisement

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: Kas Mohammed

Kas Mohammed

Posts: 1457

April 17, 2012

I say if the Research was funded by a Federal Grant, which is the Public Hard Owned money; the patent should belong to the public (Public Domain). 

Avatar of: Kas Mohammed

Kas Mohammed

Posts: 1457

April 17, 2012

Patents resulting from using Public money grants should belong to the public domain.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

April 17, 2012

I say if the Research was funded by a Federal Grant, which is the Public Hard Owned money; the patent should belong to the public (Public Domain). 

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

April 17, 2012

Patents resulting from using Public money grants should belong to the public domain.

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement
Brady
Brady

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
TwistDx
TwistDx
Advertisement