Advertisement

It’s Raining Mice

A new brown tree snake control strategy takes to the skies as scientists scatter toxic rodents over Guam’s forest canopy.

By | May 1, 2012

image: It’s Raining Mice GERONIMOUSE! Managers throw mice toxic to brown tree snakes from a helicopter.USDA APHIS Wildlife Services

GERONIMOUSE! Managers throw mice toxic to brown tree snakes from a helicopter. USDA APHIS WILDLIFE SERVICES

Guam has brown tree snake problems. Alien, secretive, and extremely hungry, the reptiles snuck onto Guam as unintentional cargo on docking ships decades ago, possibly as early as the 1940s. And now snakes bite sleeping babies, cripple electrical grids by slithering into conductors, and wreak ecological havoc.

Although most island residents never encounter the nocturnal tree-dwelling snakes, they’ve have had a particularly woeful impact on Guam’s native bird, lizard, and flying-mammal species.
The Micronesian kingfisher now exists only in captivity, and the Guam flycatcher is extinct. Only one of Guam’s three native bat species has been sighted since 1968, and endemic lizards have been decimated.

Birds are critical for dispersing and digesting seeds, says Haldre Rogers, an ecologist at Rice University in Houston who studies the impact of bird loss on Guam. Rogers’s research has shown that seeds on Guam fall to the ground rather than being carried through the forest by birds, which means the forest may be shifting toward small homogeneous pockets of plant species rather than the robust, mixed plant communities seen on nearby, snake-free islands. Reductions in birds also allowed the island’s spider populations to explode.

To try and turn this tide of disruption, wildlife managers have deployed traps, detector dogs, barriers, and poison. But these efforts are labor-intensive and difficult to implement in deep forests, where most of the snakes can be found.

Now scientists with several US Department of Agriculture (USDA) agencies, including the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), and its research arm, the National Wildlife Research Center (NWRC), together with the Guam Wildlife Services Program, are trying another angle: death from above. With grants from the Department of Defense, the researchers are testing a strategy that involves showering brown tree snake habitats with toxic mice.

FOREIGN INVADER: A brown tree snake, Boiga irregularis
FOREIGN INVADER: A brown tree snake, Boiga irregularis
WIKIPEDIA, SOULGANY 101

An 80 mg-dose of acetaminophen, which is toxic to snakes, is stuffed inside the frozen carcass of a mouse neonate. The neonate is glued to a “flagger,” a cardboard square, attached to a “four-foot long streamer, like heavy-duty toilet paper” culminating in another unbaited flagger, says USDA Wildlife Services supervisory wildlife biologist Craig Clark. When the mouse is tossed from a helicopter, “it sort of rainbows,” he says, describing the arc of the poisonous mouse, and the streamer tangles in the forest canopy where the snakes reside. USDA wildlife biologists performed one drop in September 2010 as proof of principle and are planning a larger operation this year.

It’s the culmination of decades of research, says William Pitt, who coordinates brown tree snake research for the USDA. After USDA researchers showed, in a 1997 study, that dead mice were just as effective as live mice at baiting snakes, acetaminophen was identified as a possible brown tree snake poison. Then, in 2001, NWRC researchers demonstrated that seeding traps with acetaminophen-laced mice reduced the number of nontoxic mouse baits eaten by snakes by up to 80 percent.

Managers first attempted to scatter mice from the sky in 2002, but aerial bait dropping came with its own challenges. Paper parachutes were initially used to tangle the mouse baits in treetops, but in 2007 scientists tested hardier cardboard streamers. Bait persistence in the environment is a problem, says Pitt. The mice themselves only last about three days, prompting scientists to begin hunting for some kind of inanimate bait that will attract snakes for longer periods. The streamers are a different problem. Scientists hope to find more biodegradable materials, but they too must persist long enough to keep the baits in the treetops. Ground-dwelling species, such as coconut crabs, will scavenge mice that fall to the forest floor.

After tinkering with mechanical methods of deploying the mouse baits, it’s now done by hand. The mice are arrayed on trays, and one or two people sit in the back of a helicopter and drop the bait out. “You grab them and count: one thousand, two thousand…” to disperse the mice evenly, says Daniel Vice, the assistant state director for the agencies working to control brown tree snakes on Guam. The right cadence of counting and tossing was determined by driving a pickup truck at the appropriate speed through an empty field, explains Clark. An apparatus the team previously used to spray toxic mice into the forest caused the baited streamers to stick together, dropping two or three of them at a time, or tangling them in the wheels of the slow-flying helicopter. “It looked like toilet paper was stuck to the helicopter,” Vice recalls.

The next drop will tell scientists more about the challenges of scaling up the operation. They’ll drop mice over fenced and nonfenced areas of 100 acres each. Baited (but unpoisoned) ground traps will be set, and biologists will track success at eliminating snakes by measuring how many traps are emptied. This attempt will cover several hundred acres, with a field biologist sitting in the back of the helicopter, counting and tossing.

An island-wide mouse drop using a mechanized deployment system is in the works, but for now the cumbersome manual drops are the best strategy, says Pitt. The principle has been proved, and current work is focused on smoothing out the kinks: “It’s definitely working,” he says.

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: john beckenhauer

john beckenhauer

Posts: 1

May 12, 2012

what could possibly go wrong?

Avatar of: squareWave

squareWave

Posts: 1

May 12, 2012

Hopefully somebody's dog or cat doesn't find one of these mice. Acetaminophen is toxic to them too.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

May 12, 2012

what could possibly go wrong?

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

May 12, 2012

Hopefully somebody's dog or cat doesn't find one of these mice. Acetaminophen is toxic to them too.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

May 18, 2012

Cane toads, anyone?

Avatar of: denahad

denahad

Posts: 1

May 18, 2012

Cane toads, anyone?

Avatar of: agelbert

agelbert

Posts: 50

May 19, 2012

Don't these snakes have an infrared signature that can be homed in on? Why wasn't a map created of frequency and distribution of the snakes by the defense department if they allegedly have all these 'see everything' high tech drones?

It would seem to me that a bird like an owl would be the ideal prredator against snakes that favor nocturnal activity. Owls won't prey on other birds if the snake prey runs out and will continue to seek small rodents so they would not adversely affect Guam ecology. Owls are very good at defending their nests from snakes.

Hey Guam, get some barn owls! Forget the frozen mice and Acetaminophen. It will not work. The snakes will catch on.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

May 19, 2012

Don't these snakes have an infrared signature that can be homed in on? Why wasn't a map created of frequency and distribution of the snakes by the defense department if they allegedly have all these 'see everything' high tech drones?

It would seem to me that a bird like an owl would be the ideal prredator against snakes that favor nocturnal activity. Owls won't prey on other birds if the snake prey runs out and will continue to seek small rodents so they would not adversely affect Guam ecology. Owls are very good at defending their nests from snakes.

Hey Guam, get some barn owls! Forget the frozen mice and Acetaminophen. It will not work. The snakes will catch on.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

May 21, 2012

The criterion of success seems to be decreased predation of mice.  The conclusion is that the snake population is down, but it could also result from avoidance of mouse prey by existing snakes.  In the long run, it doesn;t matter if the snakes "catch on".  If the baiting program is successful, it will select strongly against predation of mice by the local snake populaton.

Avatar of: mightythor

mightythor

Posts: 1457

May 21, 2012

The criterion of success seems to be decreased predation of mice.  The conclusion is that the snake population is down, but it could also result from avoidance of mouse prey by existing snakes.  In the long run, it doesn;t matter if the snakes "catch on".  If the baiting program is successful, it will select strongly against predation of mice by the local snake populaton.

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
Hamamatsu
Hamamatsu
Advertisement
The Scientist
The Scientist
Life Technologies