Advertisement

CT Scans Increase Risk of Cancer

Exposure to doses of radiation used in some diagnostics in childhood can triple the risk of brain cancer and leukemia as an adult.

By | June 7, 2012

WIKIMEDIA COMMONS, NITHINRAO

Children under the age of 15 who received two to three CT scans of the head have three times the risk of developing brain cancer as adults compared to those who have never received the scan, according to new research published yesterday (June 6) in The Lancet. In addition, children are also three times as likely to develop leukemia as adults if they receive 5 to 10 scans.

The study drew on data from nearly 180,000 patients who had CT performed between 1985 and 2002. A total of 74 of the patients were diagnosed with leukemia, and 135 with brain cancer.  Although absolute numbers are small, the increase in risk over the general population justifies exploring alternative imaging options such as ultrasound or MRI, the researchers argue. “Of utmost importance is that where CT is used, it is only used where fully justified from a clinical perspective,” first author Mark Pearce of Newcastle University, said in a press release.

While the findings are in line with exposure estimates that researchers developed based on atomic bomb survivors in Japan, some experts debated whether the risks were real, given the low doses used for the scans. In an accompanying commentary, Andrew Einstein of Columbia University Medical Center, wrote that this study, and others like it that are expected to be completed in the next few years, should put an end to the debate and reaffirm that “justification of any CT scan is important because good evidence suggests that 20–50 percent of such examinations could be replaced with another type of imaging or not done at all.”

Advertisement

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: Bruce Dogg

Bruce Dogg

Posts: 5

June 8, 2012

If this becomes a hard and fast fact, then it could massively change diagnostics. I have a baby under one month old with a lymph gland issue. The ultra sound showed it to be an issue but they need more images to make a proper diagnosis and treatment. We were told that they dont like CT's on small babies and that under three months we can use an MRI as they dont wiggle after a feed. Makes you wonder how safe all of these technologies really are?

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
ProteinSimple
ProteinSimple
Advertisement